2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2013.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial recolonization of the skin and wound contamination during cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial of the use of plastic adhesive drape compared with bare skin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
29
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of drapes does not allow water to pass, however it may allow bacterial transfer to the surgical field; additionally iodophore impregnated plastic adesive drape use is stated to reduce bacterial recolonization. [5,20] A study using drapes observed that proliferation occurred after the 2nd hour, similar to our study. [26] A study using a single drape found that bacteria passed the re-usable surgical drapes in 30 minutes and that due to the [11] In our study, on the tables without sterile plastic (no-plastic and non-sterile plastic groups) proliferation was observed on half the tables ( Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of drapes does not allow water to pass, however it may allow bacterial transfer to the surgical field; additionally iodophore impregnated plastic adesive drape use is stated to reduce bacterial recolonization. [5,20] A study using drapes observed that proliferation occurred after the 2nd hour, similar to our study. [26] A study using a single drape found that bacteria passed the re-usable surgical drapes in 30 minutes and that due to the [11] In our study, on the tables without sterile plastic (no-plastic and non-sterile plastic groups) proliferation was observed on half the tables ( Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…[2,[6][7][8][9][10][11] However, in spite of all these precautions there is always a risk of infection. [18][19][20] It is known that the air in the surgery may be contaminated. [21] The most significant source of SSI is the patient's own skin flora.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4,32 Importantly, despite proper skin disinfectant and draping during surgery, bacteria including coagulase-negative staphylococci and Propionibacterium acnes will begin to colonize the skin within 1 hour, with a marked bacterial colonization load at 2 hours. 12 S. aureus is a common commensal species that affects up to two-thirds of healthy individuals throughout their lifetime. 22,25 The skin provides a remarkably resistant barrier to infection by colonized bacteria due to a large extent on the production of antimicrobial proteins such as defensins and cathelicidins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these disinfection regimens, the prevalences of deep post‐operative infections still remain at approximately 1% and 4%, respectively . In a recent study , we were also able to isolate CoNS from the skin immediately before incision in cardiac patients, i.e., after disinfection with chlorhexidine in alcohol in the operating theatre.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%