2018
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/125/1/012057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial pattern and role of laboratory parameters as marker for neonatal sepsis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After checking duplicates and reading abstracts and excluding relevant literature according to the exclusion criteria, a final total of 14 studies were used for the current meta-analysis 10–23. The specific process is shown in figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After checking duplicates and reading abstracts and excluding relevant literature according to the exclusion criteria, a final total of 14 studies were used for the current meta-analysis 10–23. The specific process is shown in figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After checking duplicates and reading abstracts and excluding relevant literature according to the exclusion criteria, a final total of 14 studies were used for the current meta-analysis. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] The specific process is shown in figure 1. Of these, 783 neonates in the sepsis group and 716 neonates in the non-sepsis group were studied and evaluated.…”
Section: Identification Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 In study a value of 4.79 was considered cut off for early onset sepsis while it was 3.169 for 77% sensitivity and 78% specificity and 9.4 cut off NLR for 61.5% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity. 13,14 There has been many studies with NLR and PLR assessing sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value for early onset sepsis. 15,16…”
Section: Figure 1: Mean Value Of Nlrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) The so-called partial volume effect caused by the focal point of the light source and the size of the detector, the efficiency of the detector and the stability of the device are all sources of error in data collection [12][13]. Some errors can be corrected correctly by hardware, while other errors need to be corrected by algorithms.…”
Section: The Main Impact Of Ct Image Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%