2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00238-006-0092-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial growth on adhesive dressing tapes used for the closure of surgical wounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the use of adhesive adjuncts may stimulate the host's response to infection. 39,40 The development of wound infection may be influenced by the location as well as the nature of the surgical operation. Patient's skin flora is the main source of pathogens involved in the majority of superficial surgical infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of adhesive adjuncts may stimulate the host's response to infection. 39,40 The development of wound infection may be influenced by the location as well as the nature of the surgical operation. Patient's skin flora is the main source of pathogens involved in the majority of superficial surgical infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using microbial cultures once per month, 506 cultures were obtained for 361 patients over one year. Several factors were significantly correlated with colonization, including the In vitro work using tape samples from patients Berkowitz et al, 1974 9 Marples et al, 1985 10 Keys et al, 1978 11 Aziz et al, 1984 12 Rammaert et al, 2012 13 Livesley and Richardson,1993 14 Bundy, 1989 15 Powell et al, 1987 16 CDC, 1978 17 Diaz et al, 1986 18 Love, 2013 19 Krug et al, 2016 20 Oldman, 1991 21 James et al, 2000 22 Gartemberg et al, 1978 23 Stiller et al, 1994 24 Krug et al, 2014 25 Lindberg et al, 2017 6 Redelmeier & Livesley, 1999 26 Arpin et al, 2002 27 Bauer and Densen, 1979 28 Hughes et al, 1995 29 Mantyh et al, 2017 30 Cady et al, 2011 31 Lipscombe and Juma, 2007 32 Everett et al, 1979 33 du Plessis et al, 1997 34 Spencer et al, 2018 35 Harris et al, 2012 36 Bottone et al, 1979 37 Dickinson et al, 1998 38 Hooker et al, 2020 7 Mead et al, 1979 39 Alsuwaida 2002 40 Dennis et al, 1980 42 Garg et al, 2009 43 Patterson et al, 1986 44 McClusky et al, 2015 41 Endoh et al, 2004 45 Christiaens et al, 2005 46 Lalayanni et al, 2012 47 Foster ...…”
Section: In Vitro Work Using Samples From Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent retrospective analysis of 1216 cosmetic breast surgery patients, Hever et al 28 suggested no difference between the use of Micropore tape and other conventional wound dressings in the prevalence of postoperative wound healing problems in cosmetic breast surgery. Hever states that “evidence suggests that the use of Micropore TM tape as a dressing for surgical incisions may be associated with reduced/comparable rates of infection in surgical wounds.” They also suggest that introduction of Micropore as inner dressing may “have significant cost implications, both in terms of reducing the costs associated with the dressing of surgical wounds, and costs associated with managing infective complications.” Hever, however, links the claimed evidence of reduced rates of infection to an article by Lipscombe and Juma, 29 who applied unsterile versus sterile microporous tape onto disinfected but intact skin in volunteers and merely measured the bacterial growth underneath the tapes at 1 week after application. The fact that that microporous tapes provide favorable microenvironments with less bacterial proliferation than occlusive barriers has been well documented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also suggest that introduction of Micropore as inner dressing may "have significant cost implications, both in terms of reducing the costs associated with the dressing of surgical wounds, and costs associated with managing infective complications." Hever, however, links the claimed evidence of reduced rates of infection to an article by Lipscombe and Juma, 29 who applied unsterile versus sterile microporous tape onto disinfected but intact skin in volunteers and merely measured the bacterial growth underneath the tapes at 1 week after application. The fact that that microporous tapes provide favorable microenvironments with less bacterial proliferation than occlusive barriers has been well documented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%