2004
DOI: 10.1080/01490450490438775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial Growth Dynamics, Limiting Factors, and Community Diversity in a Proposed Geological Nuclear Waste Repository Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacterial growth rates estimated in this paper reveal maximum turnover times of actively dividing cells, due to the fact that our counts of bacteria may also include inactive or dormant cells. Rates determined in this study are higher than those observed in other groundwaters (1.7-3.7 h) (Horn et al 2004), although it should be pointed out that the rates reported by this article were calculated under laboratory conditions, and possible temporal and spatial variabilities shown by microbial communities in natural systems, including aquifer systems (Goldscheider et al 2006), were therefore not taken into account. In river waters (33.2-71.5 h) (Fischer and Pusch 2001), river sediments (12.1-44.3 h) (Fischer and Pusch 2001) and shallow soil horizons (2.1-13.1 h) (Bååth 1998), bacterial growth rates have been described as being faster than those found in the aquifer system of Doñana.…”
Section: Microbiological Variablesmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bacterial growth rates estimated in this paper reveal maximum turnover times of actively dividing cells, due to the fact that our counts of bacteria may also include inactive or dormant cells. Rates determined in this study are higher than those observed in other groundwaters (1.7-3.7 h) (Horn et al 2004), although it should be pointed out that the rates reported by this article were calculated under laboratory conditions, and possible temporal and spatial variabilities shown by microbial communities in natural systems, including aquifer systems (Goldscheider et al 2006), were therefore not taken into account. In river waters (33.2-71.5 h) (Fischer and Pusch 2001), river sediments (12.1-44.3 h) (Fischer and Pusch 2001) and shallow soil horizons (2.1-13.1 h) (Bååth 1998), bacterial growth rates have been described as being faster than those found in the aquifer system of Doñana.…”
Section: Microbiological Variablesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Curiously, these four piezometers grouped together in group 2 of the dendogram (Figure 2), showing that not only do they share similar microbiological characteristics, but also chemical and physical groundwater properties. In fact, it has been observed that high DOC concentration appears to promote protein synthesis in balanced growth (Kirchman and Rich 1997;Pulido-Villena and Reche 2003) and that phosphate significantly stimulates AMB, BCP and BGR (Horn et al 2004). Unfortunately, organic carbon concentrations were not determined in this study, but significant, positive relationships were found among SRP, TP, AMB, BCP and BGR.…”
Section: Factors Controlling Microbial Activities In Groundwater Temmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In unsaturated solids and sediments, water content influences nutrient diffusion, providing a major important constraint on microbial activity (Kieft et al 1993). In an investigation probing the effects of anticipated water infiltration from precipitation at some point during the lifetime of the repository, Horn et al (2004) demonstrated that despite P and C limitations, significant growth of aerobic chemoheterotrophic microorganisms, from 10 4 -10 5 to 8×10 6 cells mL −1 , occurred upon addition of a simulated groundwater without added organic carbon. In a finding consistent with the previous conclusions of Kieft et al (1997), the authors concluded that although the degree of water saturation was 86%, it appeared to be the primary factor limiting in situ microbial growth.…”
Section: Geomicrobial Considerations For Deep Subsurface Waste Reposimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These results are significant in that after about 1000 years following waste emplacement, groundwater is expected to drip into the repository environment. These experiments showed that significant microbial growth is possible when groundwater becomes available even absent of any added organic carbon (2).…”
Section: Present Ym Microbial Community and Limiting Factors To Growthmentioning
confidence: 93%