2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial diversity and ecosystem function of filamentous microbial mats from aphotic (cave) sulfidic springs dominated by chemolithoautotrophic “Epsilonproteobacteria”

Abstract: Filamentous microbial mats from three aphotic sulfidic springs in Lower Kane Cave, Wyoming, were assessed with regard to bacterial diversity, community structure, and ecosystem function using a 16S rDNA-based phylogenetic approach combined with elemental content and stable carbon isotope ratio analyses. The most prevalent mat morphotype consisted of white filament bundles, with low C:N ratios (3.5-5.4) and high sulfur content (16.1-51.2%). White filament bundles and two other mat morphotypes had organic carbon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
155
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(218 reference statements)
2
155
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Filamentous epsilonproteobacteria dominate in waters with high sulfide and low oxygen, while Thiothrix dominate in waters with low sulfide and high oxygen. A similar pattern was suggested by 16S rDNA clone frequencies in a study of LKC (Engel et al, 2004), but has not been demonstrated until now. Figure 2 also shows that either sulfide or oxygen concentrations alone are poor predictors of biofilm compositions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Filamentous epsilonproteobacteria dominate in waters with high sulfide and low oxygen, while Thiothrix dominate in waters with low sulfide and high oxygen. A similar pattern was suggested by 16S rDNA clone frequencies in a study of LKC (Engel et al, 2004), but has not been demonstrated until now. Figure 2 also shows that either sulfide or oxygen concentrations alone are poor predictors of biofilm compositions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In the sample, detectable (X2 mM) O 2 was absent and bottom water would have evolved to sulfide/oxygen ratios b12 within a few days by abiotic oxidation alone (Millero, 2005). At sulfide/ oxygen ratios4150, biofilms of filamentous e-proteobacteria replace the g-proteobacteria groups Beggiatoa and Thiothrix in cave waters (Engel et al, 2004;Macalady et al, 2008), and many e-proteobacteria such as S. kujiense are capable of microaerophilic growth at micromolar O 2 (Kodama and Watanabe, 2004). Sulfide-oxidizing bacteria activity also explains the absence of detectable thiosulfate (S 2 O 3 2À ) and sulfite (SO 3 2À ), which would otherwise accumulate during abiotic sulfide oxidation (Millero, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Both of these sites are characterized by a main, sulfidic spring, emanating into a streamlet where whitish mats of sulfide-oxidizing bacteria cover the submerged surfaces. These aquifers are very similar to sulfidic cave springs that are rich in sulfide, ammonia and sulfate (Engel et al, 2004) but poor in dissolved organic carbon, suggesting that the major microbial community of the biotopes are chemolithoautothrophs (Engel et al, 2003;Kodama and Watanabe, 2004). Although, sulfidic springs represent o10% of terrestrial fresh water springs (Palmer, 1991), they are believed to have an important role in global sulfur-cycling (Engel et al, 2003), as they can spawn huge amounts of microbial biomass mainly consisting of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria such as Thiothrix, Beggiatoa and Sulfuricuvum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%