2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial contamination of saline nasal irrigations in children: An original research

Abstract: Microbiologic analysis of nasal saline irrigations (NSIs) used in hospitalized children was performed. Of 253 collected samples, 24.9% were positive, and the number of positive samples significantly increased over time (P < .001). Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently detected bacterium (28.6%). None of the 118 patients who received NSIs developed a nasosinusal infection. Colonization by cutaneous and environmental germs is frequent and develops early. Hygienic measures should be advocated to reduce co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NSI have been used for centuries to remove nasal secretions and facilitate nasal drainage (16, 17) and still today are widely prescribed by pediatricians as a simple, inexpensive and well tolerated way to routinely clean the upper airways (18). They are generally considered safe, as despite colonization of nasal saline solution used for NSI by cutaneous and environmental germ is possible, respiratory pathogens are usually not involved and there is no evidence that this condition would facilitate the development of any related infection (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NSI have been used for centuries to remove nasal secretions and facilitate nasal drainage (16, 17) and still today are widely prescribed by pediatricians as a simple, inexpensive and well tolerated way to routinely clean the upper airways (18). They are generally considered safe, as despite colonization of nasal saline solution used for NSI by cutaneous and environmental germ is possible, respiratory pathogens are usually not involved and there is no evidence that this condition would facilitate the development of any related infection (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%