2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial contamination in the anterior chamber after povidone–iodine application and the effect of the lens implantation device

Abstract: In uneventful clear corneal phacoemulsification, meticulous technique can prevent antibiotic use during surgery. No difference in anterior chamber bacterial contamination was found between IOL implantation using an injector or a forceps.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our survey the most numerous bacterial colonization was Staphylococcus epidermidis and Micrococcus luteus isolated in conjunctiva before the antiseptic solution application and remained some CFU from both species in the patients conjunctivas after the ansiseptic application, as it is described by Bausz [9]. We found Corynebaterium diphteriae in normal conjunctivas before the antiseptic application (sample A), with no clinical significance, because theydid not have in the bacterial cells DNA the structural Gen of Fago B that make it sinthetize its harmful toxin.…”
Section: Further Researchsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In our survey the most numerous bacterial colonization was Staphylococcus epidermidis and Micrococcus luteus isolated in conjunctiva before the antiseptic solution application and remained some CFU from both species in the patients conjunctivas after the ansiseptic application, as it is described by Bausz [9]. We found Corynebaterium diphteriae in normal conjunctivas before the antiseptic application (sample A), with no clinical significance, because theydid not have in the bacterial cells DNA the structural Gen of Fago B that make it sinthetize its harmful toxin.…”
Section: Further Researchsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Contamination of the anterior chamber by microorganisms of the conjunctival or palpebral flora can occur during intraocular surgery, which can vary from 2.0% to 46.25% (33)(34) . Thus, bacterial DNA can be detected in a small number of specimens of aqueous or vitreous humor collected from patients without evidence of intraocular infection included in control groups (9) .…”
Section: Clinical Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las bacterias aisladas pertenecían a la microbiota de los tejidos perioculares, principalmente el grupo de Staphylococcus coagulasa negativa (Staphylococcus epidermidis y otros) presente en 70% de los cultivos, Staphylococcus aureus (10%), Streptococcus spp (9%), Enterococcus spp (2%), otras especies grampositivas (3%), y especies gramnegativas (6%) 6,8 . La microbiota conjuntival puede ingresar a la cámara anterior, directa o indirectamente, por la manipulación quirúrgica, los instrumentales, el implante del lente intraocular, e incluso, por filtración a través de la incisión en el post-operatorio 7,[9][10][11][12] . Para disminuir el riesgo de las infecciones postquirúrgicas, es necesario conocer la naturaleza de esta microbiota conjuntival en nuestros pacientes, y así recomendar la mejor profilaxis antimicrobiana en cirugía de catarata 7,13 , además constatar si existen factores asociados…”
Section: Introductionunclassified