2015
DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.me14123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial Community Analysis of Drinking Water Biofilms in Southern Sweden

Abstract: Next-generation sequencing of the V1–V2 and V3 variable regions of the 16S rRNA gene generated a total of 674,116 reads that described six distinct bacterial biofilm communities from both water meters and pipes. A high degree of reproducibility was demonstrated for the experimental and analytical work-flow by analyzing the communities present in parallel water meters, the rare occurrence of biological replicates within a working drinking water distribution system. The communities observed in water meters from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this approach has increased our knowledge regarding the bacterial diversity within WDS (Lührig et al . ; Revetta et al . ), DNA‐based studies cannot discriminate between active and dead bacteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this approach has increased our knowledge regarding the bacterial diversity within WDS (Lührig et al . ; Revetta et al . ), DNA‐based studies cannot discriminate between active and dead bacteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most drinking water sequencing-based studies have used the 16S rRNA gene as the target gene and DNA as the template molecule. While this approach has increased our knowledge regarding the bacterial diversity within WDS (L€ uhrig et al 2015;Revetta et al 2016), DNA-based studies cannot discriminate between active and dead bacteria. Alternatively, rRNA transcripts have recently been used as templates in NGS studies (Pitk€ anen et al 2013;Jalava et al 2014;Kapoor et al 2015;Inkinen et al 2016) as they provide information on the active fraction of microbial communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characterization of community signatures can establish system benchmarks and provide information on how to improve membrane performance by controlling membrane fouling. Methods based on DNA have been used to identify and describe microbial communities in biofilms (Luhrig et al 2015, Rastogi & Sani 2011, Bereschenko et al 2010). However, more recent developments in DNA‐based next‐generation sequencing (NGS) offer more powerful, high‐throughput, culture‐independent results that provide a more complete, rapid, and accurate identification and characterization as well as functional capability of microbial communities (Proctor & Hammes 2015, Tan et al 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Significant concentrations of potentially pathogenic bacteria have been discovered in the municipal water supply, including Mycobacteria, Staphylococcus, Acinetobacter, Corynebacterium, and Streptococcus species. 40 Mycobacteria are known to form biofilms in moist areas, such as showerheads and hot tubs, 17,39,41,42 and have been implicated in a study associating mycobacterial sinus infections with cultured mycobacteria from water faucets. 12 However, this study 12 was observational in nature and not designed to assess if these bacterial infections resulted from sinus irrigations using contaminated water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%