2009
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819673aa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial Colonization After Tunneling in 402 Perineural Catheters: A Prospective Study

Abstract: The incidence of perineural catheter colonization is low with subcutaneous tunneling. Controlled randomized studies are warranted to determine whether this procedure decreases the risk for infection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Tunneling also does not show any association between duration of catheter use and risk of infection, as opposed to the increased correlation found when tunneling is not performed. 4,11 Tunneling of the catheter may also decrease the risk of dislodgement in outpatient cases, due to its fixed placement subcutaneously. 4 Therefore, in immunocompromised cancer patients, one must use all techniques to decrease infection risk: strict aseptic catheter placement, prophylactic antibiotics, and subcutaneous tunneling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Tunneling also does not show any association between duration of catheter use and risk of infection, as opposed to the increased correlation found when tunneling is not performed. 4,11 Tunneling of the catheter may also decrease the risk of dislodgement in outpatient cases, due to its fixed placement subcutaneously. 4 Therefore, in immunocompromised cancer patients, one must use all techniques to decrease infection risk: strict aseptic catheter placement, prophylactic antibiotics, and subcutaneous tunneling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method, used in all three of our cases, aims to increase the distance between the catheter insertion site and the nerve 18 . In a study of tunnelled nerve blocks, the bacterial colonisation rate was only 6.2% 18 which is substantially better than the range of 17 to 57% reported in studies in which tunnelling was not used 16,19,20 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also suggested in guidance on epidural management from the Royal College of Anaesthetists and The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland [7]. Although there is some evidence suggesting that tunnelling of epidural catheters may reduce bacterial colonisation [8] there is little to say that it reduces epidural infection rates. This is likely to be due to the fact that despite bacterial colonisation of catheters infection rates remain very low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%