2013
DOI: 10.1007/bf03356474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial canker of tomatoes — histological characterization of cultivar resistance and seed transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate the identified genomic region, Rcm6 was dissected by 12 InDel markers ( Figure 2B ; Supplementary Table 3 ). Forty-seven tomato cultivars were evaluated for bacterial canker resistance including previously reported cultivars such as resistant “IRAT L-3” ( Stüwe and von Tiedemann, 2013 ) and susceptible “Moneymaker” ( Mohd Nadzir et al, 2019 ). For the qualitative resistance screening, cultivars were classified as resistant (disease severity score ≤ 2.0) and susceptible (disease severity score ≥ 3.0; Bartkiewicz et al, 2018 ; Abebe et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To validate the identified genomic region, Rcm6 was dissected by 12 InDel markers ( Figure 2B ; Supplementary Table 3 ). Forty-seven tomato cultivars were evaluated for bacterial canker resistance including previously reported cultivars such as resistant “IRAT L-3” ( Stüwe and von Tiedemann, 2013 ) and susceptible “Moneymaker” ( Mohd Nadzir et al, 2019 ). For the qualitative resistance screening, cultivars were classified as resistant (disease severity score ≤ 2.0) and susceptible (disease severity score ≥ 3.0; Bartkiewicz et al, 2018 ; Abebe et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tomato bacterial canker is one of the devastating diseases causing substantial economic loss ( Chang et al, 1992 ; Poysa, 1993 ). Breeding of a resistant cultivar is the most efficient and eco-friendly method to control tomato bacterial canker ( Stüwe and von Tiedemann, 2013 ; Sen et al, 2015 ). The QTL analysis was conducted in a few resistant accessions of wild species for bacterial canker resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different enzymes produced by Cmm take part in the degradation of cell walls during the infection process and these are responsible for the virulence of the pathogen [9,10]. Diverse reports state that Cmm-infected plants accumulate phenolic compounds, such as lignin and callose, at their xylem tissues [53,54], the lignin are cross-linked phenolic polymers that also form part of cell walls, the associated bands exhibited an enhancement at 1370 and 1600 cm −1 [47]. Other Raman bands assigned to phenolic nature compounds also showed changes in the relative intensity, because the 1284 cm −1 wavenumber increased in diseased plants (BCTo).…”
Section: Spectral Differences Between Groups: Hto and Bctomentioning
confidence: 99%