2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(99)00113-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial biofilm formation on polyvinyl chloride, polyethylene and stainless steel exposed to ozonated water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
85
1
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
85
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Different results were obtained by Cloete et al (2003), where biofilm formation was higher on the PVC surfaces than on galvanized steel piping. van der Kooij and Veenendaal (2001) and Clark et al (1994) observed that PE supports biofilm formation in a higher degree than PVC, while Wingender and Flemming (2004), Pedersen (1990) and Zacheus et al (2000) concluded that there was no significant difference in the colonization of the investigated materials (stainless steel, PVC and PE), in some cases after decades of operation. Lethola et al (2004Lethola et al ( , 2005 found that biofilms grew faster in PE than in copper pipes, but such differences could not be detected in older piping systems; these authors also studied the release of nutrients from the surface materials to the bulk water and the deleterious effects that this may cause on the water quality and on the efficacy of chlorine disinfection.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different results were obtained by Cloete et al (2003), where biofilm formation was higher on the PVC surfaces than on galvanized steel piping. van der Kooij and Veenendaal (2001) and Clark et al (1994) observed that PE supports biofilm formation in a higher degree than PVC, while Wingender and Flemming (2004), Pedersen (1990) and Zacheus et al (2000) concluded that there was no significant difference in the colonization of the investigated materials (stainless steel, PVC and PE), in some cases after decades of operation. Lethola et al (2004Lethola et al ( , 2005 found that biofilms grew faster in PE than in copper pipes, but such differences could not be detected in older piping systems; these authors also studied the release of nutrients from the surface materials to the bulk water and the deleterious effects that this may cause on the water quality and on the efficacy of chlorine disinfection.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detachment of bacteria from this biofilm may thus affect the water quality. Previous investigators have shown that bacterial growth occurring on pipe walls depends on different factors: concentrations of disinfectant (Momba et al, 1998;Momba and Binda, 2002), water temperature (Kaye and Nagy, 1999;Zacheus et al, 2000), pipe materials (LeChevallier et al, 1990) and concentration of biodegradable dissolved organic carbon (BDOC) which is the main substrate allowing bacterial growth in drinking water LeChevallier et al, 1993;Servais et al, 1995;Servais, 1996). The characteristics of the material composing pipes may greatly influence the densities of bacteria fixed in a distribution system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Niquettei demonstrated that the materials from synthetic materials (PE, PVC) were less colonized by biofilm than pipes made of iron, copper and steel, however, on the other hand, Zacheusi demonstrated a lack of significant differences in colonization of synthetic materials (PE, PVC) and steel [19,20]. Schwartz have shown in their work that more bacterial cells are gathered on the surface of polyethylene, what is favorable for a faster growth of biofilm than on the surface of PVC [21].…”
Section: E3s Web Of Conferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%