Bacterial Accumulation on Triclosan-Coated and Silk Sutures After Dental Implant Surgery

Etemadi, Ardavan; Bitaraf, T; Amini, Amir; Goudarzi, Mina

doi:10.29252/jrdms.4.3.1

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 19 publications

(31 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Successful osseointegration is an indication of favorable bone response to the insertion of a dental implant. (39) However, the long-term success-ful osseointegration of dental implants in the jawbones is due to the precision of the biomechanics of implants and their superstructure. Implant surface topography and surface roughness, bone-implant interface, implant design, implant length and diameter, geometric features of the edentulous site, and supporting properties of bone have been reported as important factors in the load transfer mechanism and bone-implant response.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effective Factors in Implant System Selection by Dentists in Kerman in 2018: A Cross-Sectional Study

Estabragh¹,

Golestaneh

Gorji

et al. 2019

J Res Dentomaxillofac Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aim: Since different implant systems are available, dentists are confronted with the question of which criteria are essential for a proficient implant system selection. This study aimed to investigate the factors affecting implant system selection by dentists in Kerman. Materials and Methods:A questionnaire inspecting the key factors in implant system selection was distributed among 120 dentists. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the data. Result: Most dentists used two implant systems at the office (52.5%). For the majority of dentists (40.8%), the first factor in choosing an implant system was the implant support services. The price of each implant (25.8%) and the satisfaction of previous cases (23.3%) were the second and third factors, respectively. For most dentists (59.2%), the least important reason for choosing an implant system was the manufacturing country. Recommendation from colleagues (24.2%) was of minor importance in implant system selection. Sixty-one (50.8%) dentists had a history of abandoning an implant system because of failure (59.0%) and lack of support from the importer (27.9%). The quality of the implant was the major cause of system selection for 68.8% of dentists and 75% of specialists (P<0.05). Conclusion:The most important reason for choosing an implant system was postsales services. The cost of each implant and the satisfaction of previous cases were other important factors. The least important factor was the system's manufacturer.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effective Factors in Implant System Selection by Dentists in Kerman in 2018: A Cross-Sectional Study

Estabragh¹,

Golestaneh

Gorji

et al. 2019

J Res Dentomaxillofac Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Factors Influencing Selection of Dental Implants Among Implantologists in Saudi Arabia

Alzahrani,

Kayal,

Tomishan

2023

j biomater tissue eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: This study aims to determine the variables influencing Saudi Arabia implantologists’ choice of the implant system. Materials and Methods: 78 dental implantologists in Saudi Arabia were interviewed and asked to complete a questionnaire. The questionnaire included age and gender demographic, followed by inquiries on the standards for choosing implant systems and used Likert scales. Results: Gender, place of employment, and specialization comparison between the doctor’s opinion and Fisher’s tests will be analyzed. The post-sale service (66.6%), size and prosthesis variety (59%), ease of surgical and prosthetic stages (56.4%), geometry and surface, and kind of connections were the most significant factors. The most relevant element in choosing an implant system was the implant system’s popularity (51.2%), and the least relevant aspect was a referral from a dentist (20.5%). One of the insignificant variables in choosing an implant system was the manufacturing country (25.6%). Patient preference (25.3%) is the irrelevant and negligible element influencing the choice of dental implant systems. Conclusions: This study indicated that most dentists prefer acid etching and blasting surface treatments.

show abstract

Comparison of Pain, Wound Healing, Facial Edema, and Surgeon’s Comfort in Surgical Extraction of Impacted Third Molars: Surgical Scalpel Versus Radiofrequency Incision

Golestaneh

MalekiGorji

2020

J Res Dentomaxillofac Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aim: This study aimed to compare the level of pain, wound healing, facial edema, and surgeon's comfort in surgical extraction of impacted third molars using surgical scalpel versus radiofrequency (RF) incision. Materials and Methods: IThis split-mouth clinical trial evaluated 41 patients with bilateral impacted third molars in one jaw with the same Pederson difficulty index (between 5 and 7, moderate difficulty). The surgical incision was made using a surgical scalpel on one random side and an RF device on the contralateral side. The level of pain was measured using a numerical rating scale (NRS) 7 days postoperatively. The wound healing was evaluated using the wound evaluation scale (WES) 4 weeks postoperatively. Facial edema was quantified using a tape measure 7 days postoperatively. Surgeon's comfort was assessed by asking the surgeons regarding the level of easiness of the procedure. The pain score, wound healing score, facial edema, and surgeon's comfort in surgical extraction of impacted third molars were compared between the two sides using SPSS 22 via paired t-test and McNemar's test. Result: The surgeon's comfort was significantly higher in the use of a surgical scalpel (P<0.001). The difference in pain score (P=0.95), wound healing (P=0.32), and facial edema (P>0.05) was not significant between the two groups. Conclusion:The results of this study showed no significant difference in surgical extraction of impacted third molars using a surgical scalpel or an RF device regarding the level of pain, wound healing, or facial edema.

show abstract

Bacterial Accumulation on Triclosan-Coated and Silk Sutures After Dental Implant Surgery

Cited by 5 publications

References 19 publications

Effective Factors in Implant System Selection by Dentists in Kerman in 2018: A Cross-Sectional Study

Effective Factors in Implant System Selection by Dentists in Kerman in 2018: A Cross-Sectional Study

Factors Influencing Selection of Dental Implants Among Implantologists in Saudi Arabia

Comparison of Pain, Wound Healing, Facial Edema, and Surgeon’s Comfort in Surgical Extraction of Impacted Third Molars: Surgical Scalpel Versus Radiofrequency Incision

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About