1986
DOI: 10.1097/00007611-198612000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacteremia During Bronchoalveolar Lavage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Infection surveillance alone could be performed with a smaller volume (eg 120 ml 5 ) and a lower fever rate would then be expected. The fever is associated with pyrogenic cytokine release rather than bacteraemia in most cases, 15,20,21 although bacteraemia has been demonstrated after rigid bronchoscopy. 22 Our study has not demonstrated any clear-cut cases of BAL during neutropenia causing bacteraemia: two of the three neutropenic subjects who were found to have pathogenic bacteria in BALF subsequently developed fever, but so did four others, and none of the BALF organisms were found on blood culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infection surveillance alone could be performed with a smaller volume (eg 120 ml 5 ) and a lower fever rate would then be expected. The fever is associated with pyrogenic cytokine release rather than bacteraemia in most cases, 15,20,21 although bacteraemia has been demonstrated after rigid bronchoscopy. 22 Our study has not demonstrated any clear-cut cases of BAL during neutropenia causing bacteraemia: two of the three neutropenic subjects who were found to have pathogenic bacteria in BALF subsequently developed fever, but so did four others, and none of the BALF organisms were found on blood culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bronchoalveolar lavage has been widely and effectively used to collect lung fluid from ventilated subjects [26], but questions remain regarding its correlation with bronchial biopsy results and repeatability [27]. Furthermore, although BAL is generally considered to be safe [27][28][29], transient adverse effects have been widely described [26,[30][31][32][33][34]. The recent dramatic increase in research interest in lung fluid has certainly been influenced by the fact that EBC collection has emerged as a potential noninvasive alternative to induced sputum and BAL fluid for measuring some inflammatory markers in nonventilated subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%