2002
DOI: 10.1053/jinf.2002.0978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacteraemia due to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: An Analysis of 45 Episodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
94
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
94
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results highlight the fact that Central-venous lines are the most common source of SMB (SMB was attributed to a CVC infection in almost 55.6% of our patients). This finding is consistent with those of other reports [5] In cases where there is no obvious source of infection it has been suggested that these devices may be the primary source [16]. Muder et al [11] reported that in their series 56% of cases with SMB did not have a clinically apparent portal of entry but 84% of these individuals had a CVC in place.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results highlight the fact that Central-venous lines are the most common source of SMB (SMB was attributed to a CVC infection in almost 55.6% of our patients). This finding is consistent with those of other reports [5] In cases where there is no obvious source of infection it has been suggested that these devices may be the primary source [16]. Muder et al [11] reported that in their series 56% of cases with SMB did not have a clinically apparent portal of entry but 84% of these individuals had a CVC in place.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…First, the absence of a control group is a limitation recognised by the authors, and has previously been a valuable inclusion in studies of this kind [22] [23]. Second, we've included only 31 cases, indeed most previous studies had analysed a small population and have been mostly retrospective and only few of these included more than 35 patients [5] [11] [22] [24]. Finally, the heterogeneity of patients, lack of appropriate statistical analysis and lack of definition of nosocomial episodes of bacteraemia, lack of the criteria for attributing death to the bacteraemic episode were not specified, thus we had difficulties of determining a precise cause of death for our population who had multiple active co-morbidities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When S. maltophilia was again detected in the same patient at an interval of 8 or more days after the first BSI episode had improved, the detection of the isolate was regarded as a different episode of BSI, as previously reported. 13,20 The severity of illness was assessed by the bacteremia score according to the University of Pittsburgh (PITT score). 21,22 The D-index and cumulative D-index, which were calculated as the area over the neutrophil curve that is based on a graph plotting the absolute neutrophil counts during neutropenia, 23 were also investigated to evaluate the impact of both duration and severity of neutropenia on S. maltophilia infection.…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catheter removal seems to be crucial, since 92% of patients with catheter removal survived, compared with only 54% without catheter removal [69].…”
Section: Of 42mentioning
confidence: 99%