1971
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.4.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Backward-Angle Electron-Proton Elastic Scattering and Proton Electromagnetic Form Factors

Abstract: Elastic electron-proton scattering cross sections were measured at backward angles (80"-90") in the laboratory for four-momentum transfers between 7 F -~ and 45 F-'. Experimental errors range from 3.1% to 5.3%, including a systematic error estimated to be 1.9% added in quadrature. Electric and magnetic form factors are computed from all the recent data in this q2 range, with allowance made for possible normalization differences. The results show a deviation from the scaling law.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
97
0
2

Year Published

1972
1972
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
97
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 shows Rosenbluth separation results performed in the 1970's as the ratio G Ep /G D , where G D is the dipole FF given below by Eq. 14; it is noteworthy that these results strongly suggest a decrease of G Ep with increasing Q 2 , a fact noted in all four references [Ber71,Pri71,Bar73,Han73]. As will be seen in section 3.4, the slope of this decrease is about half the one found in recent recoil polarization experiments.…”
Section: Rosenbluth Form Factor Separation Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 4 shows Rosenbluth separation results performed in the 1970's as the ratio G Ep /G D , where G D is the dipole FF given below by Eq. 14; it is noteworthy that these results strongly suggest a decrease of G Ep with increasing Q 2 , a fact noted in all four references [Ber71,Pri71,Bar73,Han73]. As will be seen in section 3.4, the slope of this decrease is about half the one found in recent recoil polarization experiments.…”
Section: Rosenbluth Form Factor Separation Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…All cross section measurements have been single arm experiments, (e, e ′ ), except three early experiments at Cambridge [Pri71,Han73] and DESY [Bar73] in which both proton and electron were detected, (e, e ′ p), and the most recent one of Qattan et al [Qat05], in which only the proton was detected, (e, p). In all cases, measured raw cross sections need to be corrected for QED processes to first order in α ∼ 1/137, before accessing the cross section corresponding to one-photon-exchange, or Born term.…”
Section: Rosenbluth Results and Radiative Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fit to TPE corrected data is given by 1-3-1 network (violet line), the data (red points) is taken from [70]. The fit to "old Rosenbluth data" (green points) is given by 1-1-1 network (violet line), the data is taken from [71,[78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86]. The fit uncertainty is computed with eq.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[70]). However, to see the TPE effect we consider also the original, (called here old Rosenbluth data) G M p /µ p G D [71,[78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86] and G Ep /G D [71, 78-84, 87, 88] data sets. 4 The neutron form-factor data (G En and G M n ) are obtained from…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4a,4b), which define the Dirac and Pauli form factors, respectively, and fitted the remaining parameters, α q and p q in the Regge term in Eq. (6), to the available proton and neutron form factors [31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: A Description Of Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%