2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2009.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Backward and forward bisimulation minimization of tree automata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we present an efficient implementation of DFTA using usual graph properties. We give a general algorithm for the standard minimization and we show that the asymptotic complexity of this construction reaches the best known one which can be deduced by combining Abdullah et al [18] and Högberg et al [20] works on NFTA. For the second, we extend materials presented in [21] and we detail a new incremental DFTA minimization approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, we present an efficient implementation of DFTA using usual graph properties. We give a general algorithm for the standard minimization and we show that the asymptotic complexity of this construction reaches the best known one which can be deduced by combining Abdullah et al [18] and Högberg et al [20] works on NFTA. For the second, we extend materials presented in [21] and we detail a new incremental DFTA minimization approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…But, Abdullah et al [18] introduced a method in which they adapted Paige-Tarjan algorithm [19] to refine an equivalence relation in order to minimize a non-deterministic automata (NFTA). Since the deterministic automata is a particular case of non-deterministic automata, the last approach works well for it and gives the best known complexity in tree case which is O(r⋅m⋅log(n)) where r is the maximum rank of the alphabet, m is the size of the automaton and n is the number of its states (see [20]). In this paper, we present an efficient implementation of DFTA using usual graph properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known that M is minimal if and only if it does not have two dierent, but equivalent states. For every dta M , an equivalent minimal dta can be computed eciently using an adaptation [7] of Hopcroft's algorithm [9], which runs in time O( m log n) where = max rk(Σ) is the maximal rank of the input symbols, m = |dom(δ)| is the number of transitions, and n = |Q| is the number of states. From now on, let M = (Q, Σ, δ, F ) be a minimal dta, which automatically yields that M is trim.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, our hyper-minimization for dta is based on a congruence that is similar to the context-language equivalence used in dta minimization [3]. The fastest known algorithm for dta minimization [7] runs in time O( m log n), where is the maximal rank of the input symbols, m is the number of transitions, and n is the number of states of the input dta. The hyper-minimization algorithm that we present has the run-time complexity O( mn), which is slightly worse than traditional minimization, but we believe that our algorithm can be improved using the standard techniques used in hyper-minimization of dfa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning algorithms for regular languages of words or trees are usually based on the Myhill-Nerode theorem, that is on an algebraic characterization of the unique minimal automaton recognizing the target language [14,2,6,13]. The learning problem is then to identify this unique automaton in the limit from finite samples of positive and negative examples that characterize the language.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%