2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2548544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Backtesting Expected Shortfall: Accounting for Tail Risk

Abstract: The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BIS) has recently sanctioned Expected Shortfall (ES) as the market risk measure to be used for banking regulatory purposes, replacing the well-known Value-at-Risk (V aR). This change is motivated by the appealing theoretical properties of ES as a measure of risk and the poor ones of V aR. In particular, V aR fails to control for "tail risk". In this transition, the major challenge faced by …nancial institutions is the unavailability of simple tools for evaluation of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, various rudimentary backtests have been proposed over the years and applied in the commodity sector (see, e.g., Del Brio et al, 2020; Youssef et al, 2015). In a recent article, Du and Escanciano (2017) make an important contribution to ending the backtesting debate for ES by developing unconditional and conditional coverage tests (with suitable size and power properties), which are easy to implement and to comprehend because they use ideas similar to the established VaR backtests. In many fields, these new tests are receiving significant attention because, after years of theoretical research, they finally allow a judgment of available ES estimators (see Hoga, 2019; Le, 2020; Novales & Garcia‐Jorcano, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, various rudimentary backtests have been proposed over the years and applied in the commodity sector (see, e.g., Del Brio et al, 2020; Youssef et al, 2015). In a recent article, Du and Escanciano (2017) make an important contribution to ending the backtesting debate for ES by developing unconditional and conditional coverage tests (with suitable size and power properties), which are easy to implement and to comprehend because they use ideas similar to the established VaR backtests. In many fields, these new tests are receiving significant attention because, after years of theoretical research, they finally allow a judgment of available ES estimators (see Hoga, 2019; Le, 2020; Novales & Garcia‐Jorcano, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate whether our ES estimators can provide accurate forecasts of future ES, we rely on the unconditional and conditional backtests of Du and Escanciano (2017). We do this in a rolling‐window setting because the quality of ES predictions may vary over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also provide the rtau command to estimate τ j for more general cases, including MDS as in Escanciano and Lobato (2009), as well as backtests for VAR and ES with estimation effects as in Escanciano and Olmo (2010) and Du and Escanciano (2017), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…U [0, 1] variables (see Rosenblatt [1952]). Cumulative violations have been recently introduced in Du and Escanciano (2017). The variables {u t } ∞ t=1 necessary to construct {H t (α)} ∞ t=1 are generally unknown because the distribution of the data G is unknown.…”
Section: Applications To Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation