1977
DOI: 10.1080/713819601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Backscattering of Electrons Evaluated by the Eikonal-approximation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy seems to be smaller only for very thin films and low atomic numbers (Schmoranzer and Grabe 1976). The deviation factor of 2-3 seems to arise (i) from plural scattering already becoming noticeable for films only a few tenths of nm thick, as could be confirmed experimentally by Muller and Schroder (1977), and by Monte-Carlo calculations (Berger 1963, (ii) from the fact that the Rutherford scattering cross-section for larger atomic numbers and scattering angles {} > 90 0 is too small and has to be replaced by the ,Mott scattering cross-section or other higher approximations , Lehmann and Schoenebeck 1977, Hahn 1977a, (iii) partly from neglecting, in the simple theory presented above, the mean energy loss of the incident electrons travelling in the target before suffering a Rutherford collision. This mean energy loss, caused by processes discussed in section 3.1, enhances the effective Rutherford cross-section because of its energy dependence: the electron wavelength A increases and thereby also the backscattering constant Ctheor (9).…”
Section: Scattering At Single Atomsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The discrepancy seems to be smaller only for very thin films and low atomic numbers (Schmoranzer and Grabe 1976). The deviation factor of 2-3 seems to arise (i) from plural scattering already becoming noticeable for films only a few tenths of nm thick, as could be confirmed experimentally by Muller and Schroder (1977), and by Monte-Carlo calculations (Berger 1963, (ii) from the fact that the Rutherford scattering cross-section for larger atomic numbers and scattering angles {} > 90 0 is too small and has to be replaced by the ,Mott scattering cross-section or other higher approximations , Lehmann and Schoenebeck 1977, Hahn 1977a, (iii) partly from neglecting, in the simple theory presented above, the mean energy loss of the incident electrons travelling in the target before suffering a Rutherford collision. This mean energy loss, caused by processes discussed in section 3.1, enhances the effective Rutherford cross-section because of its energy dependence: the electron wavelength A increases and thereby also the backscattering constant Ctheor (9).…”
Section: Scattering At Single Atomsmentioning
confidence: 79%