2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2020.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Backpropagation algorithms and Reservoir Computing in Recurrent Neural Networks for the forecasting of complex spatiotemporal dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
189
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 323 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
189
1
Order By: Relevance
“…with accuracy comparable to LETKF-Ext, if we have perfect observations. This result is consistent with Chattopadhyay et al 2019, Pathak et al (2017) or P. R. Vlachas et al (2020), and we can expect that RC has a potential to predict various kinds of spatio-temporal chaotic systems.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…with accuracy comparable to LETKF-Ext, if we have perfect observations. This result is consistent with Chattopadhyay et al 2019, Pathak et al (2017) or P. R. Vlachas et al (2020), and we can expect that RC has a potential to predict various kinds of spatio-temporal chaotic systems.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, the interpolated data inevitably includes errors even if the observation data itself has no error, so it should be verified that RC can predict accurately by training data with some errors. Previous works such as Chattopadhyay et al, 2019, or P. R. Vlachas et al, 2020 have not considered the impact of error https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-211 Preprint. Discussion started: 21 August 2020 c Author(s) 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…176 Another approach would be to use CNNs, for which backpropagation through time (BPTT) algorithms are used instead of RC computing. 176,177 Regularization procedures utilizing BPTT were also shown to be more effective in chaotic attractor reconstruction. 176,177 CNN-based methods may be better suited for the classification of time series gene expression dynamics, while RNN algorithms, such as RC, are best for time series forecasting/ attractor reconstruction.…”
Section: <mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…176,177 Regularization procedures utilizing BPTT were also shown to be more effective in chaotic attractor reconstruction. 176,177 CNN-based methods may be better suited for the classification of time series gene expression dynamics, while RNN algorithms, such as RC, are best for time series forecasting/ attractor reconstruction. 166 RC is computationally cheaper to train in the case of full-state information acquisition whereas, gated architectures are better for reduced order states/observables.…”
Section: <mentioning
confidence: 99%