2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2006.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Backlash phenomenon observation and identification in electromechanical system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4), the deadzone function and the sign function are not differentiable, so they must be smoothed. We use a smooth, continuous and differentiable function in place of deadzone function [16]:…”
Section: Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4), the deadzone function and the sign function are not differentiable, so they must be smoothed. We use a smooth, continuous and differentiable function in place of deadzone function [16]:…”
Section: Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modelling of backlash torque was presented in Merzouki and Cadiou [2005], who used using a differentiable function to represent backlash and suggested a nonlinear observer for estimation of backlash amplitude. This method was validated experimentally in Merzouki et al [2007], in which a sliding mode observer was used for estimation of backlash torque. Based on this estimation, backlash function parameters were identified offline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method employs modelling of backlash in terms of variable shaft stiffness, depending on the deadzone size, and it addresses the requirement for fast and accurate estimation of the deadzone angle. Similarly to Merzouki et al [2007], a second order Super-twisting Sliding Mode observer (STSMO) is used to estimate the backlash torque. This value is utilized by an adaptive estimator designed with the purpose to determine the deadzone angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its robustness properties, the proposed control scheme is able enough to compensate parametric uncertainties and unmodeled dynamics as backlash. Furthermore, while in the literature, to the best of the authors knowledge, it has been considered a narrow backlash angle [1,10]; in this work, a wide backlash angle near to 2π has been considered, i.e. a one tooth gear mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%