2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Background values for evaluation of heavy metal contamination in sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
30
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, as the velocity increased, particle- particle collision would become more frequent, facilitating the desorption of the labile fraction of heavy metals in SPM; (2) Particles which are smaller than 0.45 µm (the size of filter membrane in this study) entrained into the overlying water increased (Table 2). According to the previous study [16], finer particles tend to enrich more heavy metals than larger ones. Therefore, it is possible that heavy metals adsorbed onto particles (smaller than 0.45 µm) would result in an increase in dissolved phase, due to the fact that their passing through the filter membrane would be calculated as the dissolved fraction.…”
Section: Sediment and Overlying Water Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In addition, as the velocity increased, particle- particle collision would become more frequent, facilitating the desorption of the labile fraction of heavy metals in SPM; (2) Particles which are smaller than 0.45 µm (the size of filter membrane in this study) entrained into the overlying water increased (Table 2). According to the previous study [16], finer particles tend to enrich more heavy metals than larger ones. Therefore, it is possible that heavy metals adsorbed onto particles (smaller than 0.45 µm) would result in an increase in dissolved phase, due to the fact that their passing through the filter membrane would be calculated as the dissolved fraction.…”
Section: Sediment and Overlying Water Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The commonly used approach to establish the reference values is to compare the concentration of the target metals in contaminated and uncontaminated sediments that are mineralogically and texturally similar or identical (Fukue et al, 2006;Abrahim and Parker, 2008). Our previous study in this area showed that the average sedimentation rates were only 0.29, 0.69 cm y À1 for sites 8 and 7, respectively ).…”
Section: F4 Residuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased concentrations of heavy metals are associated with the smaller size fraction (i.e., silt or clay) due to greater sorption capacity (Bengtsson and Picado 2008;Fukue et al 2006;Schuster 1991). In BBL-1, minimum Hg concentrations occurred at 52 cm (the base of core BBL-1), where sand, silt, and clay comprised 82, 17, and \1%, respectively.…”
Section: Big Bear Lakementioning
confidence: 99%