[11,12], is force-based; members are dimensioned at the ultimate limit state (ULS) for internal forces derived via elastic analysis under external ("seismic") forces derived from a "design" response spectrum, which results from dividing the ordinates of the 5 %-damped elastic response spectrum by an empirical "behaviour" (or "force reduction") factor. Member detailing rules, presumed to provide ductility commensurate with the behaviour factor employed in the analysis, are prescriptive, opaque and by and large arbitrary. A single level of seismic action is normally considered (the "design seismic action", chosen in general to have a 10 % probability of being exceeded in 50 years, i.e. a mean return period of 475 years). The damage done to non-structural elements (e.g. partition walls) by a more frequent ("serviceability") seismic action is sometimes checked [11], but this is a nonstructural verification, independent of the structural material. This design approach is opaque when it comes to the seismic performance achieved and, overall, sub-optimal.The fib Model Code 2010 includes fully fledged performance-based seismic design and assessment, targeting specific and measurable performance for more than one level of seismic action. Multi-tier performance targets range from avoiding structural damage in frequent, small earthquakes to preventing collapse under very rare ones of extreme intensity; there are two intermediate levels of damage and performance for seismic events with intermediate intensity and frequency of occurrence. Moreover, fib Model Code 2010 adopts as the basis of verifications the real direct effect of an earthquake, notably displacements and deformations, not internal forces. This is in recognition of the fact that an earthquake imposes displacements on a structure, not forces; forces are an indirect result of those displacements and depend on the force resistance of the structural components. In these two fundamental features, as well as in several aspects of implementation, fib Model Code 2010 follows in the footsteps of [13], which is the first seismic standard in Europe -second only to [14] in the world -that is fully performance-and displacementbased. Note that both [13] and [14] are standards for existing buildings, whereas fib Model Code 2010 covers seamlessly the assessment of the seismic performance of existing structures and the design of new ones to meet ex-