2013
DOI: 10.1002/acp.2952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Background Sound Impairs Interruption Recovery in Dynamic Task Situations: Procedural Conflict?

Abstract: Interruptions impair performance even on simple, static, laboratory-based tasks, but little research has looked at their impact in more complex and realistic settings that involve dynamically evolving circumstances and other environmental stressors. Using a radar operator task with or without background sound, participants were unexpectedly interrupted to complete another task which masked the radar screen as the scenario continually evolved. Task efficiency was impaired by interruption: Decision-making time w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we cannot unequivocally link fixation time to the cognitive function of comprehending the alert, research into the so-called mind-eye hypothesis provides growing evidence that measures of oculometry can help inform us of underlying mental processes (e.g., Theeuwes, Belopolsky, & Olivers, 2009;Tremblay & Saint-Aubin, 2009;). In the current context, we made the assumption that time fixating the alert could be used to provide an indication of the time needed for participants to decide what action to take in order to make a response (Morrison, Marshall, Kelly, & Moore, 1997;Hodgetts et al, 2014;Poole & Ball, 2006). Since the designs were believed to be equally legible, we expected that fixation time on the alert would not differ as a function of notification type.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we cannot unequivocally link fixation time to the cognitive function of comprehending the alert, research into the so-called mind-eye hypothesis provides growing evidence that measures of oculometry can help inform us of underlying mental processes (e.g., Theeuwes, Belopolsky, & Olivers, 2009;Tremblay & Saint-Aubin, 2009;). In the current context, we made the assumption that time fixating the alert could be used to provide an indication of the time needed for participants to decide what action to take in order to make a response (Morrison, Marshall, Kelly, & Moore, 1997;Hodgetts et al, 2014;Poole & Ball, 2006). Since the designs were believed to be equally legible, we expected that fixation time on the alert would not differ as a function of notification type.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although much is known about the impact of background sound on visual-verbal serial short-term memory (Hughes & Jones, 2001), little is known about whether, and how, background sound impairs memory for complex visual information (cf. Wais & Gazzaley, 2011) especially within applied settings (Hodgetts, Vachon, & Tremblay, 2014). This appears remiss especially in forensic settings since the auditory environment, being one component of multiple sources of environmental information, could potentially have an influence on the accuracy and therefore reliability of information recalled about a crime and its perpetrator(s) (Marsh et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is perhaps because the tone was the only auditory stimulus played during the experiment, and so having established a basic effect of the tone, further study would need to determine whether the same benefits could be observed within a more complex auditory environment. Many command and control settings are characterized by background sounds and conversation between other personnel that might be critical to the state of the mission, but that can nonetheless be disruptive to other features of the task (Hodgetts et al, 2014). Nonetheless, our study showed that multisensory integration is a promising avenue to support change detection and decision making in complex and dynamic environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The experiment used the Simulated Combat Control System (S-CCS) microworld (see Hodgetts, Vachon, & Tremblay, 2014;Vachon et al, 2012) run on a PC. This microworld provides a functional simulation of threat evaluation and combat power management processes (i.e., response planning, execution, and monitoring) that can also be generalized to other command and control situations.…”
Section: Microworldmentioning
confidence: 99%