1989
DOI: 10.1080/02827588909382584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Background pollination in Pinus sylvestris seed orchards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

7
30
1
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
7
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Schnabel (1988) has shown, however, that 15-50 per cent of the effective pollinations in three G. triacanthos sites are by pollen originating outside the sites. These values are comparable to estimates of pollen migration rates for wind-pollinated species (Friedman & Adams, 1985;Nagasaka & Szmidt, 1985;Harju & Muona, 1989). More specifically for the site discussed in this paper, nearly 50 per cent of the sampled progeny were sired by individuals not within the site, and no association was found between an individual's location in the site and the proportion of its ovules fertilized by immigrant pollen (Schnabel, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Schnabel (1988) has shown, however, that 15-50 per cent of the effective pollinations in three G. triacanthos sites are by pollen originating outside the sites. These values are comparable to estimates of pollen migration rates for wind-pollinated species (Friedman & Adams, 1985;Nagasaka & Szmidt, 1985;Harju & Muona, 1989). More specifically for the site discussed in this paper, nearly 50 per cent of the sampled progeny were sired by individuals not within the site, and no association was found between an individual's location in the site and the proportion of its ovules fertilized by immigrant pollen (Schnabel, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…2-13% mislabelling reported in ramets of Douglas-fir (Adams 1983) by using allozyme markers. Similarly, Harju and Muona (1989) found 7-10% of mislabelled ramets in two Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) orchards, 10% in two loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) orchards (Wheeler, Jech 1992) whereas Kawauchi and Goto (1999) found 19.9% of mislabelling ramets within P. hunbergii planting. In this study, 15 out of 81 trees (18.52%) were mislabelled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process may result in mislabelling and inadvertent mixing of planting materials. Mislabelling and misplanting are common problems in forest plantation even with proper management and involvement of experienced workers (Harju, Muona 1989;Wheeler, Jech 1992;Kawauchi, Goto 1999). Early detection of plant mislabelling will provide simple solutions to the problem such as replanting the plants or simply correcting the label.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the genes are introduced to a seed orchard via alien pollen that originated from populations maladapted to the habitat of the offspring establishment, gene flow may reduce the fitness of the offspring and seriously affect the survival and production of operational plantations. Pollen contamination level depends on several factors, including the amounts of pollen production inside an orchard, the flowering synchronization among the orchard clones, the timing and duration of female cone receptivity of orchard clones relative to other pollen sources, the level of pollen production in neighboring stands, and annual weather variation (such as wind direction, temperature, and rainfall) during the period of male conelet maturation and female conelet receptivity (Harju and Muona, 1989;Burczyk et al, 2004b;Alizoti et al, 2010). The data related to annual climatic conditions prevailing over the last 10 years in the seed orchard area show that the mean monthly temperatures during the flowering season (2006) had not significantly deviated for the last 10 years, including the year of the flowering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an ideal seed orchard, panmixia is fulfilled when the following are present: (1) completely random fertilization (including lack of incompatibility), (2) equal number of male gametes per clone for all the seed orchard clones, (3) equal number of female gametes per clone for all the seed orchard clones, (4) no fertilization from alien pollen, (5) all seed orchard clones having equal self-fertility for all clones in the seed orchard, and (6) lack of genetic barriers affecting embryo viability (Codesido et al, 2005). If individuals in seed orchards do not reproduce panmictically, some reduction in the expected genetic gains will be observed (Harju and Muona, 1989). Fertilization by alien pollen is one possible reason for loss of the expected genetic gain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%