2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cvi.2016.0426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Background modelling using discriminative motion representation

Abstract: Robustness is an important factor for background modelling on various scenarios. Current pixel-based adaptive segmentation method cannot effectively tackle diverse objects simultaneously. To address this problem, in this study, a background modelling method using discriminative motion representation is proposed. Instead of simple usage of intensity to construct the background model, the proposed method extracts a new local descriptor which uses a weighted combination of differential excitations for each pixel … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the CDnet2014 dataset, we present the comparison of WePBAS, PBAS [14], GMM-Zivkovic [8], GMM-Stauffer and Grimson [7], ViBe [12], SBBS [25], and Zhong2017 [17] (see Table 3). Since the ViBe method and the PBAS method have not published the experimental results on CDnet2014, we use the test results of the two methods on the CDnet2014 dataset which can be got in the paper [17] and the paper [26]. Other results are derived from the original paper or the results published by the authors on the web.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the CDnet2014 dataset, we present the comparison of WePBAS, PBAS [14], GMM-Zivkovic [8], GMM-Stauffer and Grimson [7], ViBe [12], SBBS [25], and Zhong2017 [17] (see Table 3). Since the ViBe method and the PBAS method have not published the experimental results on CDnet2014, we use the test results of the two methods on the CDnet2014 dataset which can be got in the paper [17] and the paper [26]. Other results are derived from the original paper or the results published by the authors on the web.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%