2020
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Background insect herbivory increases with local elevation but makes minor contribution to element cycling along natural gradients in the Subarctic

Abstract: Herbivores can exert major controls over biogeochemical cycling. As invertebrates are highly sensitive to temperature shifts (ectothermal), the abundances of insects in high‐latitude systems, where climate warming is rapid, is expected to increase. In subarctic mountain birch forests, research has focussed on geometrid moth outbreaks, while the contribution of background insect herbivory (BIH) to elemental cycling is poorly constrained. In northern Sweden, we estimated BIH along 9 elevational gradients distrib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This inconsistency may be explained by the different methods used for data analysis: Galmán et al (2018) combined all data on herbivory from sites located at different mountain ranges, whereas we compared woody and herbaceous plants based on correlations observed within individual elevational gradients. Similar differences between the outcomes of these two types of analysis were previously demonstrated by Kristensen et al (2020): a decrease in herbivory with elevation was significant in individual gradients, but not significant when data from all gradients were combined. Analyses based on individual gradients may be more efficient in detecting general elevational patterns than analyses combing data from different latitudes, because the latter method does not account for variation between individual gradients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This inconsistency may be explained by the different methods used for data analysis: Galmán et al (2018) combined all data on herbivory from sites located at different mountain ranges, whereas we compared woody and herbaceous plants based on correlations observed within individual elevational gradients. Similar differences between the outcomes of these two types of analysis were previously demonstrated by Kristensen et al (2020): a decrease in herbivory with elevation was significant in individual gradients, but not significant when data from all gradients were combined. Analyses based on individual gradients may be more efficient in detecting general elevational patterns than analyses combing data from different latitudes, because the latter method does not account for variation between individual gradients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Our data from six elevational gradients, in combination with other studies addressing the effects of elevation on plant-feeding insects and insect herbivory at high latitudes (Kristensen et al, 2020;Mjaaseth et al, 2005;Pepi et al, 2017;Ruohomäki et al, 1997), indicate that an increase in herbivory with elevation is more frequent in Arctic mountains than in mountains at lower latitudes (Moreira et al, 2018). This pattern, which contrasts with both theoretical predictions and the results of the analysis of elevational changes in herbivory in tropical and temperate mountains (Galmán et al, 2018), likely emerges due to an inverse elevational gradient in temperatures at the soil surface between closed-canopy forests and open alpine habitats.…”
Section: Con Clus Ionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Comparative studies of elevational changes in herbivory across latitudes are hindered by a geographic bias in research toward temperate mountains (accounting for 76% of the gradients reviewed by Moreira et al, 2018), whereas data from elevational gradients in high‐latitude (polar) mountains remain scarce (but see Kristensen et al, 2020). Filling in this gap in knowledge is especially important because ectothermic animals living at high latitudes are closer to their lower thermal limits (Deutsch et al, 2008) and may therefore show greater responses to the same absolute change in temperature compared to their counterparts living at optimum temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tundra, the field layer is dominated by the dwarf shrubs E. hermaphroditum , V. vitis‐idaea , B. nana , V. uliginosum and the bottom layer by lichens such as Peltigera aphtosa and Nephroma arcticum and bryophytes such as Ptilidium ciliare (Kaarlejärvi et al., 2012). In the area, the vegetation is affected by background herbivory as well as cyclic population outbreaks of insects and rodents (Callaghan et al., 2013; Kristensen et al., 2020; Olofsson et al., 2013). Several rodent and geometric moth outbreaks have occurred while the current experiment has been ongoing and some of them have caused severe damage to the vegetation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%