2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Background field equations for the duality symmetric string

Abstract: This paper describes the background field equations for strings in T-duality symmetric formalisms in which the dimension of target space is doubled and the sigma model supplemented with constraints. These are calculated by demanding the vanishing of the beta-functional of the sigma model couplings in the doubled target space. We demonstrate the equivalence with the background field equations of the standard string sigma model.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
135
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
135
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding spacetime theory is that of double field theory [15][16][17][18][19][20] (as in fact follows from the beta functional equations [60][61][62][63]). …”
Section: Doubled Formalismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding spacetime theory is that of double field theory [15][16][17][18][19][20] (as in fact follows from the beta functional equations [60][61][62][63]). …”
Section: Doubled Formalismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will be of interest to identify the pair of local Lorentz symmetries directly from the string worldsheet or M-theory points of view [19][20][21][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Reduction To D Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given our limited knowledge as how to quantize string theory in flux backgrounds [39,40,41,42], one can use the non geometric world-sheet construction as an equivalent 'dual' definition of the latter. Indeed duality between geometric fluxes (H ijk 3-form and T ij k torsion) and non geometric ones (Q i jk and R ijk ) has been proposed and supported by some evidence [43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,55,54,55,56,57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%