2002
DOI: 10.1006/jhev.2002.0597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Backed tools in Middle Pleistocene central Africa and their evolutionary significance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As many have observed (and as its proponents [53] themselves concede), Modes 3 and 4 work best as descriptive devices in western Europe; elsewhere they display much less integrity [9,12,89]. Moreover, the order in which these and other modes appear is not unidirectional.…”
Section: Out Of Africamentioning
confidence: 83%
“…As many have observed (and as its proponents [53] themselves concede), Modes 3 and 4 work best as descriptive devices in western Europe; elsewhere they display much less integrity [9,12,89]. Moreover, the order in which these and other modes appear is not unidirectional.…”
Section: Out Of Africamentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Direct evidence for hafting is presently lacking from African sites older than ∼ 100 ka (but see Donahue et al, 2002Donahue et al, -2004Lombard et al, 2004;Yellen, 1998). Basal thinning on points and the presence of backed pieces, however, argues for composite tools in Africa as early as ∼ 200 ka (Barham, 2001(Barham, , 2002Wendorf and Schild, 1993). We identify four primary differences between Acheulian and MSA Levallois technology in the Kapthurin Formation.…”
Section: Synthesis and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the purpose of calculating frequencies and proportions all collected pieces were tabulated. As at other MSA sites, very few trimmed pieces were recovered from the Magubike site (5.3%, n = 797) (Barham 2002;Schoville 2010). Those flakes that were retouched were generally lightly transformed into an assortment of scrapers, points and backed pieces.…”
Section: Raw Materialsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…9, 10; Table 4). Unlike backed tools from later periods that are typically produced from blades and bladelets, most of the backed segments from the Magubike site appear to have been opportunistically created from large conveniently shaped flakes (Barham 2002). The backed pieces from Magubike also declined in size during the MSA, showing continuity with smaller backed tools found in the subsequent LSA and Iron Age.…”
Section: Raw Materialsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation