Back to the Future in EU Social Policy? Endogenous Critical Junctures and the Case of the European Pillar of Social Rights

Abstract

The launch of the European Pillar of Social Rights occurred at a phase of endogenous critical juncture for Social Europe. By analyzing the Pillar's formulation and adoption process, we investigate to what extent the European Commission used the involvement of civil society and policy responsiveness to foster change in the modes of governance and legitimize stronger intervention in the social sphere, by re‐launching the methods of coordination introduced in the 1990s. Methodologically, we rely on a content analysis of EU policy documents before and after the public consultations, a content analysis of over 60 position papers and on interviews with policy actors. We find that despite increased openness and responsiveness, the Pillar initiative did not allow to alter the predominance of ‘soft law’ routes and patterns of intergovernmentalism characterizing the governance of EU social policy, a result that further qualifies the conditions that lead (endogenous) critical junctures to generate change.

Mapping the social dimension of the European Green Deal

“… 3. In the EPSR, protective social policy is explicitly mentioned (the title already refers to social rights) and included in the recommendations to Member States (European Commission, 2021). However, scholars seem to agree that the EPSR so far remains relatively toothless in fostering protective social policy on behalf of the EU (Carella and Graziano, 2022; Hermans et al, 2023; Petmesidou et al, 2023); hence we argue that the outlined division of labour still holds true. For a discussion of the role of the EPSR in the context of a ‘green transition’, see below.…”

The Juncker Commission as a Politicising Bricoleur and the Renewed Momentum in Social Europe

“…First, they highlight the political dynamics of social Europe, particularly those surrounding the legislative process and the continued difficulties posed by a deepening of integration. Second, the analysis also draws attention to the uniqueness of the Juncker Commission and the need for a more in‐depth conceptual analysis of its entrepreneurship, particularly that during what Carella and Graziano (2022) refer to as an endogenous critical juncture, namely a window of opportunity not generated by exogenous factors. Finally, the method employed provides a unique illustration of the both the approach and benefits of inductive process tracing in the context of EU studies.…”

The EU at Crossroads: 2022 as a Turning Point Year?

“…The energy crisis overlapping with the deepening of the war in Ukraine changed the trajectory of the recovery of the EU from the consequences of the pandemic (covered extensively in our Annual Review of 2021), and the deepening of inflationary trends turned into a cost‐of‐living crisis, as Beatrice Carella demonstrates in her contribution. Carella (2023) reflects on the impact of the cost‐of‐living crisis on the most vulnerable social groups, which exposed the accentuated gaps in the welfare state and social protection systems, following their severe demise from at least a decade of austerity across the EU. The author reflects on the swiftness of compensatory responses by national governments, and the contribution of the EU in allowing member states to channel the EU's recovery funds to fund those responses, enacting the so‐called Temporary Crisis Framework.…”