Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2899415.2899442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Back to School

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each question is mapped to a specific level of the SOLO taxonomy. We use the five levels of the SOLO taxonomy as adapted by Thies and Vahrenhold [17]. To measure the results numerically, we assigned each SOLO level a number ranging from 0 (prestructural) to 4 (extended abstract).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each question is mapped to a specific level of the SOLO taxonomy. We use the five levels of the SOLO taxonomy as adapted by Thies and Vahrenhold [17]. To measure the results numerically, we assigned each SOLO level a number ranging from 0 (prestructural) to 4 (extended abstract).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the increasing availability of devices to teach computer programming, the unplugged approach has remained popular. While this could be due to the attraction of working with familiar physical resources rather than having to wrangle devices and software, there is also a strong sense that students are learning something valuable from the unplugged activities (Thies & Vahrenhold, 2016). Another factor may be the widely expressed concern that too much "screen time" isn't good for students' health or learning outcomes; see for example Sigman (2012), Neophytou, Manwell & Eikelboom (2021), Pardhan et al (2022).…”
Section: Unplugged and Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%