The growing interest in the 14 th -century Muslim scholar IbnKhaldun's ideas and his essentially historical-sociological perspective implies a promise of a critical appraisal of the Eurocentric nature of the classical and contemporary social theory. An important role is played in this endeavor by Syed Farid Alatas whose work has been important not only in terms of further introducing Ibn Khaldun's theory to the Western audience but also making it more relevant to the contemporary theoretical debates and historical sociology.This article reviews Alatas' work on Ibn Khaldun with a view to demonstrate that his contributions to the Khaldunian studies today take at least five different forms: a critical examination of Ibn Khaldun's theory in general, and reconstruction of it as a theory of the state, and of religious revival in particular; demonstrating its significance for the modern social sciences; its application to a number of premodern and modern empirical cases; and a theoretical integration of his model with some modern Western theories, which is a rare occurrence in both Khaldunian studies and sociology in general.
| INTRODUCTIONThe scholarly literature on the 14 th -century Arab-Muslim thinker 'Abd al-Rahman Ibn Khaldun (732-808 AH/1332-1406 CE) entails different attitudes toward his work, presenting him from different angles using a diverse set of adjectives. For some he is a typical Aristotelian philosopher with no original contribution to philosophy or the study of history (e.g. Mahdi, 1957) or a typical historian of his own time offering no insights for today (Al-Azmeh, 1982;Gibb, 1933) -while others see him as an unusually "modern" or "secular" thinker that (surprisingly) emerged from the premodern Islamic world, finding his Muqaddima (Prolegomenon) fascinating (e.g. Nicholson, 1966;Ortega y Gasset, 1934). Still others claim he is an original philosopher and even the pioneer of the modern social science, and sociology in particular (e.g. Baali, 1988;Ben Salem, 1996;Bouthoul, 1930;Cheddadi, 2006;Conyers, 1972;Dhaouadi, 1990;Şentürk, 2016;Simon, 1959;Wafi, 1962 Spengler, 1963-64, Talbi, 1967, Baali, 1992, Cheddadi, 2006, Tomar, 2006 economy, methodology, etc. (e.g. 'Izzat, 1952;Baali & Price, 1982;Gellner, 1975;Goodman, 1972;Laroui, 1987). Still others focus on Ibn Khaldun's methodological perspective, often trying to re-articulate it in a manner that is compatible with modern debates or in a comparative fashion with a Western figure (e.g. Ahmad, 2003;Al-Marzouki, 2006;Ardıç, 2008;Dale, 2006;Hourani, 1982;Mahdi, 1957;Meuleman, 1991;Oumlil, 1982). Analyses and critical evaluations of Ibn Khaldun's concepts and view of society and the state also constitute a significant portion of the existing literature on the Khaldunian thought (e.g. Cheddadi, 1980;Hannoum, 2003;Hussein, 1917;Lacoste, 1984;Rabiʿ, 1967;Rosenthal, 1979;Stowasser, 1983;Von Sivers, 1980;Walzer, 1963). Very few, however, attempt at an application of his theoretical ideas and/or concepts to historical or contemporary empirical cases...