Back to Basics: A Sanity Check on Modern Time Series Classification Algorithms

Dhariyal, Bhaskar; Le Nguyen, Thach; Ifrim, Georgiana

doi:10.1007/978-3-031-49896-1_14

Advanced Analytics and Learning on Temporal Data

2023

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-49896-1_14

|View full text |Cite

Back to Basics: A Sanity Check on Modern Time Series Classification Algorithms

Bhaskar Dhariyal,

Thach Le Nguyen,

Georgiana Ifrim

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Comparative analysis of ROCKET-driven and classic EEG features in predicting attachment styles

Mizrahi,

Laufer,

Zuckerman

2024

BMC Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Predicting attachment styles using AI algorithms remains relatively unexplored in scientific literature. This study addresses this gap by employing EEG data to evaluate the effectiveness of ROCKET-driven features versus classic features, both analyzed using the XGBoost machine learning algorithm, for classifying ‘secure’ or ‘insecure’ attachment styles.Participants, fourth-year engineering students aged 20–35, first completed the ECR-R questionnaire. A subset then underwent EEG sessions while performing the Arrow Flanker Task, receiving success or failure feedback for each trial.Our findings reveal the effectiveness of both feature sets. The dataset with ROCKET-derived features demonstrated an 88.41% True Positive Rate (TPR) in classifying ‘insecure’ attachment styles, compared to the classic features dataset, which achieved a notable TPR as well. Visual representations further support ROCKET-derived features’ proficiency in identifying insecure attachment tendencies, while the classic features exhibited limitations in classification accuracy. Although the ROCKET-derived features exhibited higher TPR, the classic features also presented a substantial predictive ability.In conclusion, this study advances the integration of AI in psychological assessments, emphasizing the significance of feature selection for specific datasets and applications. While both feature sets effectively classified EEG-based attachment styles, the ROCKET-derived features demonstrated a superior performance across multiple metrics, making them the preferred choice for this study.

show abstract

Comparative analysis of ROCKET-driven and classic EEG features in predicting attachment styles

Mizrahi,

Laufer,

Zuckerman

2024

BMC Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Back to Basics: A Sanity Check on Modern Time Series Classification Algorithms

Cited by 1 publication

References 20 publications

Comparative analysis of ROCKET-driven and classic EEG features in predicting attachment styles

Comparative analysis of ROCKET-driven and classic EEG features in predicting attachment styles

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About