2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Back-to-back comparison of impedance measurement techniques applied to the characterization of aero-engine nacelle acoustic liners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Impedance eduction methods have received growing attention over the past decades (e.g. [26,27]). These methods avoid instrumentation of the liner sample, which could potentially affect its own impedance, and instead focus on the instrumentation of test rigs, with flush-mounted microphones at the duct walls the most popular choice (e.g.…”
Section: B Impedance Eduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Impedance eduction methods have received growing attention over the past decades (e.g. [26,27]). These methods avoid instrumentation of the liner sample, which could potentially affect its own impedance, and instead focus on the instrumentation of test rigs, with flush-mounted microphones at the duct walls the most popular choice (e.g.…”
Section: B Impedance Eduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods avoid instrumentation of the liner sample, which could potentially affect its own impedance, and instead focus on the instrumentation of test rigs, with flush-mounted microphones at the duct walls the most popular choice (e.g. [12,26]). From that, governing equations of the acoustic propagation are necessary in order to relate measurements with a numerical model of the acoustic field.…”
Section: B Impedance Eduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although very convenient from the practical point of view, this termination introduces uncertainties in the low frequency range due to the apparent mismatch between impedance tube area and exposed honeycomb area. 31 A broadband source has been used to measure the liner impedance between 500 Hz and 6400 Hz at overall sound pressure levels (OASPLs) up to 150 dB. The non-linearity factor (NLF) and effective percentage of open area were obtained with pure tones at increasing levels close to the liner resonance frequency.…”
Section: Normal Incidence Impedance Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The direct eduction methods allows the impedance evaluation by means of the wavenumber of the lined section extracted using Prony-like algorithms. 7 Ferrante et al 8 compared the in situ with an impedance eduction technique based on the two-port matrix (for both no-flow and grazing flow conditions) and with a normal incidence impedance tube (only no-flow). The results suggested good agreement between the in situ technique with both reference methods, although some discrepancies were observed, especially with grazing flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%