2012
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/02/036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Back reaction from walls

Abstract: We study the distance-redshift relation in a universe filled with 'walls' of pressure-less dust separated by under dense regions. We show that as long as the density contrast of the walls is small, or the diameter of the under dense regions is much smaller than the Hubble scale, the distance-redshift relation remains close to what is obtained in a Friedmann universe. However, when arbitrary density contrasts are allowed, every prescribed distance-redshift relation can be reproduced with such models.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the proof presented in [97] assumes that the angular element is given by the FRW metric, which is the question to be investigated [98], and the LTB model has been used to provide an exact counterexample [99] (see also [100]). It has also been argued that the distance is close to FRW as long as light travels through compensated over-and underdensities, and the time spent by a light ray in a given region is much smaller than the timescale for the evolution of the gravitational potential of the region [42]. (This argument is tied to perturbation theory, as the gravitational potential is a perturbative concept.)…”
Section: Signatures Of Backreactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the proof presented in [97] assumes that the angular element is given by the FRW metric, which is the question to be investigated [98], and the LTB model has been used to provide an exact counterexample [99] (see also [100]). It has also been argued that the distance is close to FRW as long as light travels through compensated over-and underdensities, and the time spent by a light ray in a given region is much smaller than the timescale for the evolution of the gravitational potential of the region [42]. (This argument is tied to perturbation theory, as the gravitational potential is a perturbative concept.)…”
Section: Signatures Of Backreactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. [8] we had to choose the initial overdensities such that no singularity was encountered up to the present time. In these Universes, the directions normal to the collapse, i.e.…”
Section: Relativistic and Semi-relativistic Wall Universesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a first step, a significant research endeavour was dedicated to ray tracing and distance measurements in cosmological toy-models, such as Swiss-cheese models (Brouzakis et al 2007(Brouzakis et al , 2008Marra et al 2008;Biswas & Notari 2008;Vanderveld et al 2008;Valkenburg 2009;Clifton & Zuntz 2009;Bolejko 2009Bolejko , 2011Bolejko & Célérier 2010;Szybka 2011;Flanagan et al 2013;Fleury et al 2013;Fleury 2014;Troxel et al 2014;Peel et al 2014;Lavinto & Rasanen 2015;Koksbang 2017Koksbang , 2019aKoksbang ,b, 2020a, plane-parallel Universes (Di Dio et al 2012), or lattice models (Clifton & Ferreira 2009a,b, 2011Clifton et al 2012;Liu 2015;Bruneton & Larena 2013;Bentivegna et al 2017;Sanghai et al 2017;Koksbang 2020b). These works generally agreed with the relevant theoretical predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%