2006 8th International Conference on Signal Processing 2006
DOI: 10.1109/icosp.2006.345838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Back-Propagation and K-Means Algorithms Comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multi-layer Perceptron [2][3][4], Hidden Markov Models [5][6][7], Recurrent Neural Network [8,9] and Dynamic Time Warping [10][11][12] are some common methods applied to recognize the speech signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-layer Perceptron [2][3][4], Hidden Markov Models [5][6][7], Recurrent Neural Network [8,9] and Dynamic Time Warping [10][11][12] are some common methods applied to recognize the speech signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This follows up on the exemplary neural network or k-means classifi cation (Škorpil, Šťastný, 2006;Trenz, Konečný, 2010 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models vary according to their complexity and effectivity. The most basic models propose that all indicators and dimensions have a similar weight in assessing the enterprises performance [35], whereas more complicated ones require several statistical or mathematical analyses to be performed [8,36,37], or even artificial neural networks engagement [38]. For the construction of the evaluation model, economic value added (EVA), data envelopment analysis (DEA) and sustainability value added (SVA) are used.…”
Section: Efficiency and Sustainability Assessment Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%