Back from the (Nearly) Dead: Reviving Indigenous Languages across North America

Johansen, Bruce E.

doi:10.1353/aiq.2004.0099

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Likewise, in the northwest United States, Johansen (2004) describes Darryl Kipp’s efforts to revitalize the Blackfeet native language through the foundation of The Piegan Institute in Browning, Montana, in 1987. Johansen quotes Kipp regarding some of the fundamental reasons to start the Institute:Out of the 17,000 that belong to my band, less than one per cent have a college education.…”

Section: Multiple Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The failure to provide a sustainable, appropriate, and successful educational experience for children in developing countries, children from ethnic minority groups, and children in Indian Country stems mostly from the reliance on hegemonic educational systems and curricula that are delivered in colonial languages (Asante, 2010; Brock-Utne, 2012; Johansen, 2004; Sefa Dei, 2010; Woolman, 2001). Brock-Unte (2012) decries the ongoing educational environment for many African children where they enter school not knowing how to speak the language of instruction, typically a European colonial language.…”

Section: Multiple Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The fact that they could use verbal communication for the most important piece of culture, values, and love started a chain reaction in the community. (Johansen, 2004, p. 566)…”

Section: Multiple Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

In Reciprocity: Responses to Critiques of Indigenous Methodologies

Windchief

Polacek

Munson

et al. 2017

Qualitative Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article will examine and respond to significant critiques of Indigenous research methodologies as part of an Indigenous Methodologies in Educational Research course at a midsized public university in the intermountain west. The authors will present their perspectives in response to critiques of Indigenous research methodologies as presented at the American Indigenous Research Association’s annual meeting in October of 2014. This collection of responses is offered in an effort to facilitate an interactive dialogue with scholars who use Indigenous research methodologies applicable to multiple fields of study, support scholarship that is responsive to the needs of Indigenous communities, and ultimately center relevant research design and findings within Indigenous paradigms.

show abstract

Section: Multiple Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Multiple Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

In Reciprocity: Responses to Critiques of Indigenous Methodologies

Windchief

Polacek

Munson

et al. 2017

Qualitative Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For many Indigenous groups, language is more than a political issue. Language is about aesthetics, beauty, ceremonies, fertile land, sustaining culture, and spiritual connections (Johansen, 2004). Pattanayak (2000) writes, 'By luring people to opt for globalisation without enabling them to communicate with the local and the proximate, globalisation is an agent of cultural destruction' (p. 47).…”

Section: Additional Elements For Research About Leisuresmentioning

confidence: 99%