2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2105.09915
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bachmann-Howard Derivatives

Abstract: It is generally accepted that H. Friedman's gap condition is closely related to iterated collapsing functions from ordinal analysis. But what precisely is the connection? We offer the following answer: In a previous paper we have shown that the gap condition arises from an iterative construction on transformations of partial orders. Here we show that the parallel construction for linear orders yields familiar collapsing functions. The iteration step in the linear case is an instance of a general construction t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to Higman's lemma and Kruskal's theorem for finite ordered trees, our uniform result covers the case of finite rooted trees without an order between children (let W (X) = M (X) be the set of finite multisets with elements from X) and the case of finite rooted or ordered trees with vertex labels from a given wpo Z (take W (X) = Z × M (X) and W (X) = Z × Seq(X), respectively). In [9,13] the construction of T W is relativized, so that it yields a further transformation X → T W (X), rather than a single order T W as in the present paper. This makes it possible to iterate the construction, i.e., to repeat it with X → T W (X) at the place of W .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition to Higman's lemma and Kruskal's theorem for finite ordered trees, our uniform result covers the case of finite rooted trees without an order between children (let W (X) = M (X) be the set of finite multisets with elements from X) and the case of finite rooted or ordered trees with vertex labels from a given wpo Z (take W (X) = Z × M (X) and W (X) = Z × Seq(X), respectively). In [9,13] the construction of T W is relativized, so that it yields a further transformation X → T W (X), rather than a single order T W as in the present paper. This makes it possible to iterate the construction, i.e., to repeat it with X → T W (X) at the place of W .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%