Babesiosis in Cattle

doi:10.47278/book.oht/2023.85

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 56 publications

(75 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Examining the prevalence across different animal species in Southern Punjab, the study determined that babesiosis follows a distinct order as identified by PCR: cattle > goats > sheep > buffalo > camels. This prevalence pattern is consistent with global studies, underscoring the heightened susceptibility of cattle populations to Babesia infections (Jaridehdar et al, 2022;Ali and Marif, 2023;Dhakal, 2023). The findings affirm the pervasive nature of babesiosis, particularly in cattle, across diverse geographical contexts.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Assessment of Babesia spp. prevalence in various domestic animals across Southern Punjab, Pakistan

Tariq,

Badshah,

Khan

et al. 2024

Braz. J. Biol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Parasitic diseases, notably babesiosis, exert a substantial impact on the global cattle industry, posing challenges to commerce, economies, and human health. This study, conducted in Southern Punjab, Pakistan, aimed to assess the prevalence of Babesia spp. across various livestock species using microscopic and PCR methods. A total of 180 blood samples (60 from each district) were systematically collected from apparently healthy animals, with 36 samples obtained from each domestic animal species, including camel, cattle, buffalo, goat, and sheep, noting that 12 samples were collected from each district for each animal species. Overall prevalence was determined to be 32.8% (59/180), with varying rates among species: 25.0% in cattle, 41.66% in buffalo, 30.55% in goats, 33.3% in sheep, and 33.3% in camels. Microscopic examination revealed slightly varied infection rates among large and small domestic animals (22.2%), while PCR results indicated a 32.8% overall infection rate in both large and small domestic animals, with no statistical significance. District-wise analysis showed regional variations, with Muzaffargarh recording a prevalence rate of 23.33% through microscopic examination, while Lodhran and Bahawalpur recorded 21.67%. PCR results revealed higher rates (38.33%, 26.67%, and 33.33%, respectively), underlining the importance of employing PCR for accurate detection. Examining ruminant types, large ruminants exhibited a 32.4% infection rate, while small domestic animals showed 33.3%, with no significant difference (p=0.897). District-wise prevalence showcased significant variation, with Muzaffargarh demonstrating a 25% prevalence, Lodhran 22%, and Bahawalpur 22%, through microscopic examination. PCR results displayed 38.33%, 27%, and 33.3%, respectively, with no statistical significance. Detailed analysis of individual districts highlighted variations in infection rates among camels, cattle, buffalo, goats, and sheep. The binomial test indicated significant differences through microscopic analysis (P=0.011) but non-significant variations through PCR (P=0.065), emphasizing the precision of PCR. Regional variations in prevalence, notably with Punjab exhibiting the highest frequency (33.87%) and KPK the lowest (13.24%), suggest potential influences from varying veterinary practices and environmental factors. This study underscores the pivotal role of PCR alongside microscopy for accurate babesiosis diagnosis. These findings contribute to the broader understanding of babesiosis prevalence, emphasizing the necessity of advanced molecular techniques for informed control measures.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%