Untitled

Marana, Riccardo; Catalano, Giovan Fiore; Muzii, Ludovico

doi:10.1097/00001703-200308000-00007

Cited by 16 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The ability of salpingoscopy or falloposcopy to provide better patient selection should be further evaluated in case of fimbrial pathologies [7,8].…”

Section: Patent Phimosismentioning

confidence: 99%

Evidence-based reproductive surgery: tubal infertility

Déchaud¹,

Reyftmann²,

Faidherbe³

et al. 2004

International Congress Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The ability of salpingoscopy or falloposcopy to provide better patient selection should be further evaluated in case of fimbrial pathologies [7,8].…”

Section: Patent Phimosismentioning

confidence: 99%

Evidence-based reproductive surgery: tubal infertility

Déchaud¹,

Reyftmann²,

Faidherbe³

et al. 2004

International Congress Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…[28][29][30] Thus, while laparascopic adhesiolysis can restore external tubal anatomy to facilitate oocyte pickup, tubal function may still be compromised if the endosalpinx is damaged. 31 This was clearly demonstrated in a study of 51 patients with periadnexal adhesions or hydrosalpinx, who underwent adhesiolysis or salpingostomy, respectively, in addition to salpingoscopy. 28 Patients with normal tubal mucosa at the time of laparoscopic surgery had 71% and 64% cumulative pregnancy rates in the adhesiolysis and salpingostomy groups, respectively, while those with intraluminal tubal damage had no intrauterine pregnancies.…”

Section: B) Salpingoscopymentioning

confidence: 90%

Evidence Based Diagnostic Approach to Tubal Factor Infertility

Khanum

Jahid

et al. 2014

Birdem Med J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary:Infertility has been classified with respect to a number of parameters; prominent amongst which are time, causes, treatment cost and socio-cultural implications. The most widely accepted practical classification distinguishes between primary and secondary infertilities with a further sub classification into 3 clearly defined groups that include ovulatory dysfunction, fallopian tube compromise and male factor alongside an ambiguous and controversial group labeled as "unexplained infertility". In infertility work-up various procedures can be carried out in isolation or in different combination, depending on the indication. Other complimentary procedures can be done when specifically required. So, with infertility in general the diagnosis of tubal infertility should be tailored to the individual patient. Here is a review on an evidence based approach to diagnose the tubal factors for infertility. Evidence Based Diagnostic Approach to Purpose of review:The investigation for potential tubal disease is an essential step in the work-up of infertility. This review article will provide an overview of evidence based diagnosis of tubal factor infertility. The different diagnostic tools will be described together with discussion of different minimal access surgical approaches. We intend to highlight the capital and central role of minimal access procedures playing in the diagnosis of tubal infertility as well as to demonstrate the positive impact it has in the fight against infertility; thus redefining the classification and pathology.(Birdem Med J 2014; 4(1): 33-37)

show abstract

“…There is evidence in the published literature that suggests that pelvic adhesion can cause infertility 3,[105][106][107] with an increased risk of ectopic pregnancy, 4 should the patient conceive. In fact, it has been shown that adhesions may contribute to infertility in about 40% of infertile couples 100 and represent the sole infertility factor in up to 15% of cases.…”

Section: Adhesion-associated Infertility Following Previous CD Versusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Postoperative Adhesion Development Following Cesarean and Open Intra-Abdominal Gynecological Operations

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology of adhesion development, the impact of physiological changes associated with pregnancy on markers of adhesion development, and the clinical implications of adhesion development following cesarean delivery (CD). Although peritoneal adhesions develop after the overwhelming majority of intra-abdominal and pelvic surgery, there is evidence in the literature that suggests that patients having CD may develop adhesions less frequently. However, adhesions continue to be a concern after CD, and are likely significant, albeit on average less than after gynecological operations, but with potential to cause significant delay in the delivery of the baby with serious, lifelong consequences. Appreciation of the pathophysiology of adhesion development described herein should allow a more informed approach to the rapidly evolving field of intra-abdominal adhesions and should serve as a reference for an evidence-based approach to consideration for the prevention and treatment of adhesions.

show abstract

Untitled

Cited by 16 publications

References 12 publications

Evidence-based reproductive surgery: tubal infertility

Evidence-based reproductive surgery: tubal infertility

Evidence Based Diagnostic Approach to Tubal Factor Infertility

Postoperative Adhesion Development Following Cesarean and Open Intra-Abdominal Gynecological Operations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About