2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00191-008-0119-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

B2C—bubble to cluster: the dot-com boom, spin-off entrepreneurship, and regional agglomeration

Abstract: This article studies entrepreneurial activities emerging out of one of Germany's most prominent dot-com firms, Intershop, a maker of e-commerce software. We show that Intershop spawned about 40 new ventures. Most spin-offs entered locally, giving rise to a small but growing software cluster and counteracting the job losses that accompanied the parent firm's drastic downsizing after 2000. We trace the knowledge transfer from Intershop to the spin-offs and relate it to recent theorizing on the spin-off process a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The archetypical spin-off processes leading to a clustering process are thus under-represented in the case of the offshore wind energy industry (Bünstorf & Fornahl, 2009;Mossig, 2000). However, despite an apparent lack of spin-offs some interview partners are optimistic about future industrial locations in the German regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The archetypical spin-off processes leading to a clustering process are thus under-represented in the case of the offshore wind energy industry (Bünstorf & Fornahl, 2009;Mossig, 2000). However, despite an apparent lack of spin-offs some interview partners are optimistic about future industrial locations in the German regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spillover effects from the rapid 'New Economy' growth in areas around technology hubs such as Jena have gathered momentum after a shaky start to the twenty-first century. 35 Similarly there is evidence that the initiatives to create regional innovation hubs and networks have been successful and started to generate real growth effects. 36…”
Section: Is Germany Competitive?mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Kock et al, 2012). Moreover, mobile ideas and information and easily accessible resources -facilitated by an interactive environment and knowledge spillovers -make it easier to identify opportunities for creating and commercializing innovations (Buenstorf & Fornahl, 2009, Lundmark, 2010. Furthermore, these key concepts are known, not only as contributors, but also as explanatory factors of differences that occur across various regions (Porter, 1990;Saxenian, 1994;Raynolds et al, 1994;Malecki, 1997;Feldman, 2001;Swords, 2013;Ketels, 2013a) due to their joint capability to facilitate interactions, inflows of new knowledge as well as to enable and exploit the supportive infrastructure (Feldman & Audretsch, 1999, Frenken et al, 2007Inkinen & Suorsa, 2010;Wihlborg & Söderholm, 2013).…”
Section: Definitions and Interrelationships Between Key Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%