1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0895-7061(97)90870-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

B027 Assessment of angiotensin II receptor blockade in humans using an in vitro binding assay: Comparison with the in vivo approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A separate, preliminary analysis of the same data demonstrated that the results obtained with this in vitro receptor binding assay correlate closely with results obtained in vivo with the administration of exogenous Ang II, 13 particularly when only active treatment phases are considered. This indicates that the in vitro assay is a good alternative method for characterizing Ang II receptor blockade in humans.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A separate, preliminary analysis of the same data demonstrated that the results obtained with this in vitro receptor binding assay correlate closely with results obtained in vivo with the administration of exogenous Ang II, 13 particularly when only active treatment phases are considered. This indicates that the in vitro assay is a good alternative method for characterizing Ang II receptor blockade in humans.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…12 To further assess Ang II receptor blockade, a standardized, in vitro receptor binding assay was used. 13 In brief, this in vitro binding assay measures the ability of a subject's plasma to displace radiolabeled Ang II bound to AT 1 receptors in a rat smooth muscle cell membrane preparation. Binding is performed at 37°C for 1 hour with 100 g of membrane proteins in 375 L of binding buffer in the presence of 5 fmol of labeled Ang II and 25 L of plasma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The membranes were obtained according to a method published previously (Maillard et al, 1998). For each experiment, an aliquot of membranes was thawed and centrifuged, and the pellet was resuspended in a 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, containing 5 mM MgCl 2 binding buffer to obtain a final concentration of 1 mg of protein/ml.…”
Section: Radioligand Binding Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of AT1 receptor blockade induced in rats treated by telmisartan was also measured ex vivo using the standardized radio-receptor assay described previously (Maillard et al, 1998(Maillard et al, , 2000a(Maillard et al, , 2002. To compare the activity of different doses in different rats, the results were normalized and expressed as (B X Ϫ B 0 )/(B RP Ϫ B 0 ), where B X is the residual activity in the presence of the plasma X, B 0 the nonspecific binding, and B RP is the residual activity in the presence of the reference plasma.…”
Section: In Vivo Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%