B₀ field homogeneity recommendations, specifications, and measurement units for MRI in radiation therapy

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose is: (a) Relate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality recommendations for radiation therapy (RT) to B 0 field homogeneity; (b) Evaluate manufacturer specifications of B 0 homogeneity for 34 commercial whole-body MRI systems based on the MRI quality recommendations and RT application; (c) Measure field homogeneity in five commercial MRI systems and one commercial MRI-Linac used in RT and compare the results with their B 0 homogeneity specifications. Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging quality recommendations for spatial integrity, image blurring, fat saturation, and null banding in RT were developed based on the literature. Guaranteed (maximum) and typical B 0 field homogeneity specifications for various diameter spherical volumes (DSVs) were provided by GE, Philips, Siemens, and Canon. For each system, the DSV that conforms to each MRI quality recommendation and anatomical RT application was estimated based on the manufacturer specifications. B 0 field homogeneity was measured on six MRI systems including Philips (1.5 T), Siemens (1.5 and 3 T), and ViewRay MRI (0.35 T) systems using 24 and 35 cm DSV spherical phantoms. Two measurement techniques were used: (a) MRI using phase contrast field mapping to measure peak-to-peak (pk-pk), volume root mean square (VRMS), and standard deviation (SD); and (b) Magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy by acquiring a volumetric free induction decay (FID) to measure full width at half maximum (FWHM). The measurements were used to assess: (a) conformance with the manufacturer specifications; and (b) the relationship between the various field homogeneity measurement units. Measurements were made with and without gradient shimming (gradshim) or second-order active shimming. Multiple comparisons, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Pearson correlations were performed to assess the dependence of pk-pk, VRMS, SD, and FWHM measurements of field homogeneity on shim volume, level of shim, and MRI system. Results: For a 40 cm DSV, the B 0 homogeneity specifications ranged from 0.35 to 5 ppm (median = 0.75 ppm) VRMS for 1.5 T systems and 0.2 to 1.4 ppm (median = 0.5 ppm) VRMS for 3 T systems. The usable DSVs ranged from 16 to 49 cm (median = 35 cm) based on the image quality recommendations and the manufacturer specifications. There was general compliance between the six measured field homogeneities and manufacturer specifications although signal dephasing was observed in two systems at < 35 cm DSV. The relationships between pk-pk, VRMS, SD, and FWHM varied based on MRI system, shim volume, and quality of shim. However, VRMS and SD measurements were highly correlated. Conclusions: The delineation of the diseased lesion from organs at risk is the main priority for RT. Therefore, field homogeneity performance for RT must minimize image blurring and image artifacts (null bands and signal dephasing) while optimizing spatial integrity and fat saturation. Based on the specifications and recommendations for field homogeneity, some MRI systems are not well suited to meet the stri...

Effects of B0 eddy currents on imaging isocenter shifts in 0.35‐T MRI‐guided radiotherapy (MR‐IGRT) system

“…In addition, the tool uses a fixed, phantom‐based shim (“Tune Up” shim mode) based on the field homogeneity at 0 ° . The measurement may fail from strong spin dephasing if used at gantry angles other than 0° since there are variations in field homogeneity with gantry angle and the tool does not reshim the magnetic field prior to the measurement of eddy currents 12 . The tool also requires and verifies phantom position offsets of ≤5 mm for X and Y axes, and ≤3 mm for the Z axis before acquiring eddy current measurements.…”

Task group 284 report: magnetic resonance imaging simulation in radiotherapy: considerations for clinical implementation, optimization, and quality assurance

“…This value shall also be within the vendor specification that may be defined across a certain DSV. A comprehensive report has outlined B 0 homogeneity specifications across a 40 cm DSV ranging from 0.35 to 5 ppm (median = 0.75 ppm) VRMS for 1.5 T systems and 0.2 to 1.4 ppm (median = 0.5 ppm) VRMS for 3 T systems 63 . Detailed methods for measuring MFH are outlined in several other reports 57,63 .…”

Clinical workflow for treating patients with a metallic hip prosthesis using magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy

“…Since measured and expected field distortions are compared between systems (with different machine-related B0 inhomogeneities) this workflow unjustly incorporates machine-related field distortions measured on the MRsim into the expected geometric distortions on the MR-linac. This effect, however, is expected to be negligible as field inhomogeneities are typically ≲1 ppm inside a sphere with a diameter of 40 cm for most clinical MR systems [29] .…”