2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40648-016-0064-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

B-PaDY: robot co-worker in a bumper assembly line

Abstract: In an automobile assembly line, many processes require control and human intervention. A human's dexterity and ability to react to unpredictable changes in production volume and product specifications are necessary for these processes. Thus, it remains difficult to rely on robots or other automated systems. Conversely, some tasks, such as moving to a tool rack and delivering parts, do not require human skill. In the bumper assembly process of automobile assembly, a worker must move to pick up the bumper twice … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several empirical reports have illustrated that humans and machines can indeed augment each other, thereby producing better results than either one could do alone (e.g., Bader and Kaiser, 2019;Grover et al, 2020;Kinugawa et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2016). In line with this "augmentation" philosophy, our findings more broadly emphasize that-rather than asking where humans fit in the loop of machines-it seems much more important for organizations to find out where machines fit into existing teams and departments.…”
Section: Practical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Several empirical reports have illustrated that humans and machines can indeed augment each other, thereby producing better results than either one could do alone (e.g., Bader and Kaiser, 2019;Grover et al, 2020;Kinugawa et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2016). In line with this "augmentation" philosophy, our findings more broadly emphasize that-rather than asking where humans fit in the loop of machines-it seems much more important for organizations to find out where machines fit into existing teams and departments.…”
Section: Practical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The productivity of a manufacturing system is related to several measures such as the throughput (that is the number of units produced per period), the ressources consumtion for a given output, the number of defective items produced, etc. Researchers confirm the hypothesis that power, velocity, predictability, repeatability, and precision of robots in combination with human intelligence, creativeness and skills increase the productivity of assembly lines (Michalos et al, 2014;Ore et al, 2015;Akella et al, 1999;Sadik & Urban, 2017b;Kinugawa et al, 2016). As cobots handle some tasks, adding a cobot to a fully manual line reduces the takt time, and thus increases the throughput.…”
Section: Productivitymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Shared work space 28 [13, 24, 34, 36-38, 42, 49, 59, 60, 67-70, 72-74, 76-78, 88, 91, 96, 99, 105, 112, 115, 122] Handover 22[16, 20, 21, 26, 32,40,41,46,53,54,63,65,71,80,89,94,95,98,111,118,119,123] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%