2006
DOI: 10.1583/05-1766r.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome After Endovascular Treatment of Deep Femoral Artery Stenosis:Results in a Consecutive Patient Series and Systematic Review of the Literature

Abstract: PTA of the deep femoral artery can be performed with high technical success rates at a low interventional risk. However, in the majority of patients, this technique yields no sustained hemodynamic or clinical benefit. Due to a high rate of late failures, it should be reserved for limb salvage in patients without a surgical alternative.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reductions in ankle-brachial indices (ABIs) provide a clinically useful tool for identifying symptomatic individuals at risk72, 73. Increased mobility, reduced claudication, limb salvage, and improved ABIs can often be achieved by surgical or percutaneous vascular interventions71 -- more successfully so in stenosed distal femoropopliteal segments76, 77 than proximal segments78, and less successfully so in patients with diabetes79-81. However, in the setting of T2DM, PAD arises with contributions from both medial artery calcification and atherosclerosis74.…”
Section: Inflammatory Cytokines In the Initiation And Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reductions in ankle-brachial indices (ABIs) provide a clinically useful tool for identifying symptomatic individuals at risk72, 73. Increased mobility, reduced claudication, limb salvage, and improved ABIs can often be achieved by surgical or percutaneous vascular interventions71 -- more successfully so in stenosed distal femoropopliteal segments76, 77 than proximal segments78, and less successfully so in patients with diabetes79-81. However, in the setting of T2DM, PAD arises with contributions from both medial artery calcification and atherosclerosis74.…”
Section: Inflammatory Cytokines In the Initiation And Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are consistent with those in 4 contemporary series from North America and Western Europe, with a total of 121 patients (123 limbs) reporting a technical success rate of 93% (114 of 123 limbs) and an amputation rate at 1 year ranging from 3.6% to 36%. 9,[11][12][13] Open surgical profundaplasty has long been recognized as a method of limb salvage in patients with CLI secondary to severe femoral and popliteal artery occlusive disease and who are deemed unsuitable for a femoral-distal bypass due to extensive comorbidities or lower limb integmenta necrosis/infection. Rollins et al and Savolainen et al report the two largest case series in the English literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest study to date by Dick et al reports perioperative complications occurring in 1.8% of the patients with no cases of wound infection, seroma formation, or early mortality following 55 ePFRs. 12 Diehm et al compared ePFR and surgical profundaplasty and reported no perioperative complications or mortality in the ePFR cohort, whereas the surgical profundaplasty cohort demonstrated an in-hospital mortality of 29%. 13 This study was limited by the small number (n ¼ 20) of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in other vascular beds, there are many different endovascular options available for the treatment of a stenotic diseased femoral bifurcation. Simple single‐balloon PTA is the first option for both DFA and CFA lesions [4, 9–21]. As dilation of ostial DFA or SFA lesions with single balloons can cause dissection or shifting of the plaque and can lead to an occlusion of the other vessel, the kissing balloon technique might be preferred [22].…”
Section: Endovascular Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The retrospective studies report procedural success rates ranging from 77 to 100%. Follow‐up results are often lacking and if available difficult to compare due to the variety in reported patency definitions and follow‐up times (Table I) [4, 9–18, 20, 21].…”
Section: Endovascular Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%