1962
DOI: 10.1021/ja00862a001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isothermal Diffusion Measurements on the System H2O-Glycine-KCl at 25°; Tests of the Onsager Reciprocal Relation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
102
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frictional coefficients satisfy the conditions ∑ j ) 0 N C j ij ) 0 and ij ) ji with i + j. 35 Equation 18 is equivalent to resistancebased equations previously reported by Onsager 26 and to the Stefan-Maxwell equations. 44 Contrary to (L ik ) r , ij are frame independent and have a direct physical interpretation in terms of friction between the system components.…”
Section: Frictional-coefficient Formulation Of Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The frictional coefficients satisfy the conditions ∑ j ) 0 N C j ij ) 0 and ij ) ji with i + j. 35 Equation 18 is equivalent to resistancebased equations previously reported by Onsager 26 and to the Stefan-Maxwell equations. 44 Contrary to (L ik ) r , ij are frame independent and have a direct physical interpretation in terms of friction between the system components.…”
Section: Frictional-coefficient Formulation Of Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These coefficients obey the Onsager reciprocal relations: (L ij ) 0 ) (L ji ) 0 with i + j. 35,36 We can also introduce the fluxes, (…”
Section: Thermodynamic Driving Forces For Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[25][26][27][28][29] The thermodynamics of macromolecule-salt aqueous mixtures is commonly described using molality-based chemical potential derivatives: The preferential interaction coefficient, Γ 12 , is defined by: 7,14 We now show how to relate Γ 12 to the solvent-frame diffusion coefficients. We can first solve eq 5a-d with respect to (L 12 This implies that µ 11 (m) ) 1/m 1 is an excellent approximation for relatively low macromolecule concentrations (≈10 mg/mL).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has important implications on the pH dependence of protein solubility at constant salt concentration. It is generally expected (dS 1 /dC 2 ) ) -(µ 12 /µ 11 ) + (dµ 1 s /dC 2 )/µ 11 (17) …”
mentioning
confidence: 98%