2005
DOI: 10.1583/04-1469.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms:A Shift of the Paradigm?

Abstract: It is possible to treat rAAA with EVAR. Hypotensive patients can, at least initially, be operated under local anesthesia to stabilize blood pressure utilizing a percutaneously inserted occlusion balloon. There was a trend in our study for reduced mortality and morbidity with EVAR, but further studies are required to conclude whether EVAR significantly increases survival and reduces complications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
74
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm offers the potential advantage of avoiding the complications associated with a large abdominal surgical incision, avoiding the stress on organs and tissues induced by the need to cross clamp the aorta, decreasing bleeding and inflammatory response from surgical tissue dissection, reducing risk of multiorgan failure, lessening the requirement for deep anesthesia, and providing a repair mechanism for patients who are too high risk for open repair surgical procedures due to cardiac risk factors or other comorbidity [1,[5][6][7][8][9][11][12][13]. Endovascular aneurysm repair also offers the benefit of shorter hospital stays, reduced recovery time, less post-procedural pain, and avoids the complication of adhesive intestinal obstruction when compared to open repair [1,[4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The use of EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm offers the potential advantage of avoiding the complications associated with a large abdominal surgical incision, avoiding the stress on organs and tissues induced by the need to cross clamp the aorta, decreasing bleeding and inflammatory response from surgical tissue dissection, reducing risk of multiorgan failure, lessening the requirement for deep anesthesia, and providing a repair mechanism for patients who are too high risk for open repair surgical procedures due to cardiac risk factors or other comorbidity [1,[5][6][7][8][9][11][12][13]. Endovascular aneurysm repair also offers the benefit of shorter hospital stays, reduced recovery time, less post-procedural pain, and avoids the complication of adhesive intestinal obstruction when compared to open repair [1,[4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endovascular aneurysm repair also offers the benefit of shorter hospital stays, reduced recovery time, less post-procedural pain, and avoids the complication of adhesive intestinal obstruction when compared to open repair [1,[4][5][6][7][8][9]. However, a negative aspect for EVAR is the possibility of graft movement after treatment that could allow reinstatement of the aneurysm [1,4,10,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations