2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7a02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

B-ducted Heating of Black Widow Companions

Abstract: The companions of evaporating binary pulsars (black widows and related systems) show optical emission suggesting strong heating. In a number of cases large observed temperatures and asymmetries are inconsistent with direct radiative heating for the observed pulsar spindown power and expected distance. Here we describe a heating model in which the pulsar wind sets up an intrabinary shock (IBS) against the companion wind and magnetic field, and a portion of the shock particles duct along this field to the compan… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
56
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
8
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To model the IBS emission, we estimate the magnetic field strength by assuming a toroidal field outside of the light-cylinder and I ∼ 10 45 g cm 2 together with the orbital parameters, which give B 0 ∼ 20 G. Fitting this lightcurve with our model (for a sin 2 θ * wind) gives i ∼ 75.8 • ± 5.9 • (see Table 2), which is higher than that inferred for the direct heating model (e.g. van Kerkwijk et al 2011, Sanchez & Romani 2017). With such inclination, the mass of neutron star would be ∼ 1.86M , a value much smaller than inferred through optical fit.…”
Section: Psr J1959+2048mentioning
confidence: 45%
“…To model the IBS emission, we estimate the magnetic field strength by assuming a toroidal field outside of the light-cylinder and I ∼ 10 45 g cm 2 together with the orbital parameters, which give B 0 ∼ 20 G. Fitting this lightcurve with our model (for a sin 2 θ * wind) gives i ∼ 75.8 • ± 5.9 • (see Table 2), which is higher than that inferred for the direct heating model (e.g. van Kerkwijk et al 2011, Sanchez & Romani 2017). With such inclination, the mass of neutron star would be ∼ 1.86M , a value much smaller than inferred through optical fit.…”
Section: Psr J1959+2048mentioning
confidence: 45%
“…The NuSTAR spectrum does not show a break up to 70 keV and thus we conservatively assume Ex,max at this energy. Thus γ ∼ 2.5 × 10 5 (Ex,max/B2) 1/2 ∼ (5 − 10) × 10 5 for high and low magnetizations, respectively (Rybicki & Lightman 1979). The electron population has a power law energy spectrum with index p related to the X-ray power-law index Γ as p ∼ 2Γ − 1 ∼ 1.3 below the maximum energy, extending at least down to ∼0.1-0.3 keV.…”
Section: The X-ray Emissionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…But any effect that redirects heating flux to these zones (e.g. magnetically ducted IBS particles (Sanchez & Romani 2017) or other star-spot inducing effects, see van Staden & Antoniadis 2016) will produce similar RV curve distortions. Accordingly, when showing application to two spiders in §4 we compare WH effects with those from a simple hot spot (HS).…”
Section: Light Curve and Radial Velocity Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High precision photometry near orbital minimum can detect the characteristic asymmetry imposed by wind flow, while more detail measurements of blue colors near maximum are sensitive to hot spots. For example, the small M NS ≈ 1.7M allowed by the magnetically ducted heating model of Sanchez & Romani (2017) resulted from a very small particle-heated region needed to allow d well under 2kpc. High precision B or u photometry should reveal such structure, which is not indicated in the present analysis.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Fitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation