2020
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

B cell maturation antigen‐specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: A meta‐analysis

Abstract: Introduction Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) have shown impressive results in clinical studies for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We performed a systematic literature review to summarize the current body of evidence on the role of anti‐BCMA CAR T cells for RRMM. Objectives and Methods Fifteen studies comprising a total of 285 patients with heavily pretreated RRMM were included using a conventional meta‐analysis. Main efficacy outcomes were respon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(201 reference statements)
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, at this stage, it is difficult to obtain a clear sight on the toxicity and efficacy that can be expected from this novel therapeutic approach in relapsed/refractory MM patients. To the best of our knowledge, there has been only one attempt so far to systematically aggregate the outcome data of BCMA CAR-T-cell clinical studies [18]. In that report, Gagelmann et al included 15 studies comprising a total of 285 patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, at this stage, it is difficult to obtain a clear sight on the toxicity and efficacy that can be expected from this novel therapeutic approach in relapsed/refractory MM patients. To the best of our knowledge, there has been only one attempt so far to systematically aggregate the outcome data of BCMA CAR-T-cell clinical studies [18]. In that report, Gagelmann et al included 15 studies comprising a total of 285 patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is postulated that CAR T-cell products generated in the RR setting display inferior clinical efficacy than products generated from patients after first-line induction therapy ( 167 ). In fact, a recent meta-analysis of 15 clinical trials (thereof 14 in RRMM, only 1 in NDMM) documented a CR rate of 36% with MRD negativity in 77% ( 208 ) and a mPFS of 10 months. Therefore, the curative potential in the respective patient cohorts is limited to date.…”
Section: Clinical and Logistical Challenges Of Incorporating Car T-cementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several ongoing Phase 2/3 studies continue to show the efficacy of CAR T therapy in RRMM [ 25 , 59 , 60 ]. Despite a high RR (≥70–100%) and increased survival by CAR-T cell therapy in the heavily pretreated RRMM patients who have no treatment options left [ 111 ], the high incidence of CRS and neurotoxicity, as well as the toxicity of conditioning chemotherapy are major concerns when selecting patients for this therapy ( Table 3 ). In patients with high tumor burden, the risk of CRS is even higher, resulting in exclusion from clinical studies [ 63 ].…”
Section: Which Anti-bcma Agent? Each Has Its Own Meritsmentioning
confidence: 99%