1988
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.38.2101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Azimuthal distributions in heavy ion collisions and the nuclear equation of state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
203
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
8
203
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The azimuthal distributions in that the data can be reasonably well reproduced adopting the HM1 mean field, suggesting that the MDI stiffness C in the parameterset HM is not high enough. Our conclusion is in line with results of [34], where it was reported that BUU calculations with the mean field of [18] (K = 215 MeV, i.e. the SM parametrization) underpredict the squeeze-out.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The azimuthal distributions in that the data can be reasonably well reproduced adopting the HM1 mean field, suggesting that the MDI stiffness C in the parameterset HM is not high enough. Our conclusion is in line with results of [34], where it was reported that BUU calculations with the mean field of [18] (K = 215 MeV, i.e. the SM parametrization) underpredict the squeeze-out.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Given that the momentum dependence generated by the Gogny potential comes from two Gaussians, we proceed to find a simpler version for momentum dependent potential for asymmetric matter. We will extend the parametrisation of [3,4]. Subsequently we will find an even simpler version, the kind that was used in first applications of momentum dependent potentials for heavy ion collisions.…”
Section: A Momentum Dependent Potential From a Phenomenological Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nucleon mean-field potential is defined in the nucleus rest frame and parametrized according to Welke et al [82] as a sum of a Skyrme term depending only [83]). Set #1 is momentum dependent whereas set #2 is momentum independent.…”
Section: Mean Field Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%