2012
DOI: 10.1029/2012jb009255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Azimuthal anisotropy of Lg attenuation in eastern Tibetan Plateau

Abstract: [1] The Q of seismic phase Lg is measured to approach the crustal Q b , which can be used to infer crustal rheology. A reverse two-station/event method is used to measure the interstation Q Lg , which theoretically eliminates effects from the source and site response. Strong azimuthal anisotropy of 1/Q Lg in northern Tibet is observed, which approximately correlates with the seismic velocity anisotropy observed using both surface waves and teleseismic S waves. Both the intrinsic and scattering attenuation cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…X. Y. Bao et al. (2012) found low‐ Q Lg bands in the eastern Tibetan Plateau, which correlated with zones with a low velocity and high strain rate in the middle and lower crust. This correlation suggested that the low‐ Q Lg bands were attributed to a hot (∼700) crust resulting from strain heating along major strike slip fault zones (X. Y. Bao et al., 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…X. Y. Bao et al. (2012) found low‐ Q Lg bands in the eastern Tibetan Plateau, which correlated with zones with a low velocity and high strain rate in the middle and lower crust. This correlation suggested that the low‐ Q Lg bands were attributed to a hot (∼700) crust resulting from strain heating along major strike slip fault zones (X. Y. Bao et al., 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The presence of substantial azimuthal anisotropy beneath Tibet is well established in studies using different techniques and data types, including surface-wave imaging (e.g., Griot et al 1998;Huang et al 2004;Su et al 2008;Yao et al 2010;Yi et al 2010;Yang et al 2010b;Ceylan et al 2012;Legendre et al 2015;Pandey et al 2015;Schaeffer et al 2016;Xie et al 2016;Chen et al 2016), shear-wave splitting analysis (e.g., McNamara et al 1994;Hirn et al 1995;Sandvol et al 1997;Sol et al 2007;Zhao et al 2010;Leon Soto et al 2012;Eken et al 2013;Chang et al 2015;Wu et al 2015a;Chen et al 2015;Liu et al 2016;Singh et al 2016;Ye et al 2016), receiver functions (e.g., Vergne et al 2003;Levin et al 2008;Shen et al 2015;Liu et al 2015;Kong et al 2016), attenuation studies (Bao et al 2012) and P-wave arrival times (e.g., Wei et al 2013;Huang et al 2014;Zhang et al 2016b;Wei et al 2016). Radial anisotropy (the difference between the vertically and horizontally polarized waves: V SV and V SH , respectively, in the case of S waves) is also well documented (e.g., Shapiro et al 2004;Huang et al 2010;Duret et al 2010;Guo et al 2012;Xie et al 2013;Li et al 2016).…”
Section: Azimuthal and Radial Anisotropy Beneath Tibet: A Brief Synthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weaker frequency dependence typically suggests an intrinsic attenuation mechanism whereas a strong frequency dependence implies that scattering attenuation is the dominant mechanism for the observed attenuation (e.g. Dainty, 1981;Bao et al, 2012). In the TSM and RTM methods, η is estimated by the slope of the linear function fitted to the Lg spectral ratios between two stations in function of frequency ( Figure 15).…”
Section: Lg Q Tomography: Reverse Two Station Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%